Advances in Identity Theory and Research 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9188-1_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Identity Discrepancy Theory to Predict Psychological Distress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Support was found for the influence of obligatory-actual role meaning dimension discrepancy on role dissatisfaction; an outcome that entails agitation. This has not been found in other identitydiscrepancy research (Marcussen and Large 2003;Marcussen 2006). Moreover, the six meaning dimension discrepancy variables in our study accounted for much of the variation in role satisfaction (roughly 23%-38%), indicating that role meaning plays an important part in role satisfaction; however, only discrepancies in traditional dimensions of the nurse role (i.e., the emotional and service dimensions) significantly predicted role satisfaction in this sample.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Support was found for the influence of obligatory-actual role meaning dimension discrepancy on role dissatisfaction; an outcome that entails agitation. This has not been found in other identitydiscrepancy research (Marcussen and Large 2003;Marcussen 2006). Moreover, the six meaning dimension discrepancy variables in our study accounted for much of the variation in role satisfaction (roughly 23%-38%), indicating that role meaning plays an important part in role satisfaction; however, only discrepancies in traditional dimensions of the nurse role (i.e., the emotional and service dimensions) significantly predicted role satisfaction in this sample.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Previous IDT research that examined the effect of specific identity discrepancies on distress offers some support for this relationship, as well as the notion that discrepancies between different types of identity meaning lead to specific types of distress (Marcussen and Large 2003;Marcussen 2006); however, for role-identities, the evidence regarding specific distress outcomes has been stronger for discrepancies between aspirational and self-in-role meanings and 556…”
Section: Self Role and Identity Discrepancymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…I begin with an examination of the basic assumptions of IDT Marcussen and Large 2003) that specify the at UNIV PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND on August 13, 2015 spx.sagepub.com Downloaded from relationship between the type of discrepancy experienced (aspiration and obligation) and the form of distress experienced (depression and anxiety). Specifically, I test the following hypotheses:…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar vein, developmental theory emphasizes that identity is based not only on current role occupancy (e.g., single parent; teen mother), but also on future role expectations and goals (Markus and Nurius 1986; Nurmi 1993). Both perspectives suggest that discrepancies between anticipated and actual identities produce psychological distress because they result in: 1) threat to, or loss of, identity, 2) negative self-concept, and 3) unanticipated and undesirable adjustments of self-concept (Higgins 1987; Marcussen and Large 2003). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%