2017
DOI: 10.1177/0018726717691809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using humor and boosting emotions: An affect-based study of managerial humor, employees’ emotions and psychological capital

Abstract: Evidence from emerging scholarly investigations consistently points to managerial humor as fruitful new grounds to expand management knowledge and practice. In light of this, the present study examined managerial humor as an affective event at work that has short-term emotional and long-term psychological outcomes for employees. To test this empirically, we recruited a sample of 2498 Australian employees to participate in a field experience sampling study. We also considered the potential moderating effect of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(134 reference statements)
0
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The extant studies on leader humor expression have focused predominantly on positive humor expression. Sporadic attention has been paid to leader negative (antisocial) humor expression, which is typically intended to disparage, ridicule, attack, or dominate one or multiple followers (e.g., Decker & Rotondo, 2001; Huo et al, 2012; Wijewardena, Härtel, & Samaratunge, 2017; Yam et al, 2018). Besides a scarcity of well-established measures tapping leader negative humor expression, theories guiding the investigations of leader negative humor expression also seem scarce.…”
Section: Insights and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extant studies on leader humor expression have focused predominantly on positive humor expression. Sporadic attention has been paid to leader negative (antisocial) humor expression, which is typically intended to disparage, ridicule, attack, or dominate one or multiple followers (e.g., Decker & Rotondo, 2001; Huo et al, 2012; Wijewardena, Härtel, & Samaratunge, 2017; Yam et al, 2018). Besides a scarcity of well-established measures tapping leader negative humor expression, theories guiding the investigations of leader negative humor expression also seem scarce.…”
Section: Insights and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Әзілкештік қабілеттер қазіргі таңда жоғары өзектілікке ие, себебі оны ұжымдағы адамдарды басқаруда және кикілжіңді болдырмау үшін (Lopes, Brackett, Nezlek, Schutz, Sellin, Salovey, 2004) [6], стрестік күймен күресуде (Wijewardena, Härtel, Samaratunge, 2017;Abel, 2002) [7][8] және түрлі терапиялық мақсаттарда кеңінен қолданады. Әзілдесу мен позитивті көңіл-күй адамның физиологиялық және психикалық саулығына (Абдуллаева, 2009) [1], стрестің теріс салдарының төмендеуіне ықпал жасайды (Fredrickson, 2001) [9].…”
Section: әдебиеттерге шолуunclassified
“…/ A methodical approach to the assessment of human resources` interactions Studying interactions between executives (managers) and employees, scientists have proved that the greater the quality of interactions between executives and employees, the higher the quality and work productivity of the latter (Zanozovska, 2017). There are interesting research studies on the impact of executives` managerial humor on teamwork (Wijewardena, Härtel, & Samaratunge, 2017). Humour is an event run by managers in order to provoke a positive emotional reaction from employees and create an appropriately favorable working environment.…”
Section: Contemporary Empirical Studies Of Human Resources` Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%