2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2010.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Human Visual System modeling for bio-inspired low level image processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, we will rather focus on biomimetic sparse models as tools to shape future computer vision algorithms (Benoit et al, 2010;Serre and Poggio, 2010). In particular, we will not review models which mimic neural activity, but rather on algorithms which mimic their efficiency, bearing in mind the constraints that are linked to neural systems (no central clock, internal noise, parallel processing, metabolic cost, wiring length).…”
Section: Outline: Sparse Models For Computer Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, we will rather focus on biomimetic sparse models as tools to shape future computer vision algorithms (Benoit et al, 2010;Serre and Poggio, 2010). In particular, we will not review models which mimic neural activity, but rather on algorithms which mimic their efficiency, bearing in mind the constraints that are linked to neural systems (no central clock, internal noise, parallel processing, metabolic cost, wiring length).…”
Section: Outline: Sparse Models For Computer Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. Figure 1 presents the global architecture of the adopted retina model [6] as a combination of low-level processing modules. Basically, it is a layered model with: (1) photoreceptors, where local contrast is enhanced; (2) outer plexiform layer (OPL), where the nonseparable spatio-temporal filtering removes spatio-temporal noise and enhances spatial high-frequency contours while reducing or removing the mean luminance; (3) inner plexiform layer (IPL), with two channels: the parvocellular (Parvo) channel, dedicated to spatial analysis enhancing static contours contrast, and the magnocellular (Magno) channel that enhances moving contours and removes static ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper proposes a new scheme to address the problem of unsupervised segmentation of moving objects, which exploits the fusion of information obtained from two inherently different approaches: a bio-inspired motion detection method, using low-level information from the modeling of the human visual system, and a BS algorithm based on pixel color information. The biologically inspired model of the human retina presented in [6] has been adopted for the former. Experiments were performed with several BS algorithms showing that our method consistently improves the results, particularly in complex situations, where the BS algorithms critically fail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the clipped part of each histogram is not discarded and, instead, it is redistributed among the bins that their values do not exceed the clipping threshold. • Retinex: Inspired from the Human Visual System (HVS); particularly, the retina that is a preprocessing step to condition the visual data for facilitated high level analysis, and V1 cortex area which is a low-level visual information describer [15]. The two well-known channels of the retina's output are Parvocellular channel (Parvo) that is dedicated to detail extraction and Magnocellular (Magno) for motion information extraction.…”
Section: Photometric Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%