2018
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/gly029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Heart Rate and Accelerometry to Define Quantity and Intensity of Physical Activity in Older Adults

Abstract: These findings suggest that time spent in moderate or higher intensity activities may not be lower with age after considering changes in physiology, functional ability, and subclinical disease burden and highlight the need for more age- and ability-specific PA research to inform future interventions and public health guidelines.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Days with more than 8% of the day missing (more than 120 minutes per day) were excluded, and a minimum of 4 days of valid wear was required for inclusion in the analysis . For Actiheart, time spent in MVPA was defined using the heart rate data and the Karvonen formula for heart rate reserve to define intensity of movement . For Actigraph, population‐specific cut points for MVPA were estimated by: (1) calculating the correlation between Actiheart‐derived MVPA and measured maximal aerobic fitness VO2 max ( r = 0.3), (2) testing Actigraph data cut points, ranging from 3890 CPM (80th percentile) to 9120 CPM (99th percentile) for correlation with VO2 max , and (3) identifying a cut point of 4500 CPM to most closely correspond with the correlation between Actiheart and VO2 max ( r = 0.3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Days with more than 8% of the day missing (more than 120 minutes per day) were excluded, and a minimum of 4 days of valid wear was required for inclusion in the analysis . For Actiheart, time spent in MVPA was defined using the heart rate data and the Karvonen formula for heart rate reserve to define intensity of movement . For Actigraph, population‐specific cut points for MVPA were estimated by: (1) calculating the correlation between Actiheart‐derived MVPA and measured maximal aerobic fitness VO2 max ( r = 0.3), (2) testing Actigraph data cut points, ranging from 3890 CPM (80th percentile) to 9120 CPM (99th percentile) for correlation with VO2 max , and (3) identifying a cut point of 4500 CPM to most closely correspond with the correlation between Actiheart and VO2 max ( r = 0.3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(50, 51) Therefore, PA performed at a lower accelerometer count threshold, may be more appropriate to determine the proportion of older adults meeting PA MET requirements. (12,52,53) This is an active area of research and other groups are exploring different cutpoints, (35) but for the current study we chose to keep a consistent MVPA count threshold across all age groups to test associations related to different intensities of movement rather than modifying cutpoints that would define MVPA for each age…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the distribution of total activity counts per day is right-skewed at higher intensities, total PA volume was log-transformed (log-transformed total activity counts [LTAC]). To calculate activity fragmentation, an active-to-sedentary transition probability was calculated as the number of PA bouts (consecutive minutes registering >10 counts per minute) 17 divided by the total sum of minutes spent in PA. Higher activity Cancer December 15, 2018 fragmentation (eg, a higher score) represents more interruptions in activity performed throughout the day, translating to shorter activity bouts and more sedentary time. Both total volume and activity fragmentation also were treated as categorical variables by dichotomizing each variable at their respective median values to derive "high" and "low" groups.…”
Section: Accelerometer Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%