2010
DOI: 10.1108/01443571011024610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using grounded theory method for theory building in operations management research

Abstract: Purpose Qualitative theory building approaches, such as Grounded Theory Method (GTM), are still not very widespread and rigorously applied in Operations Management (OM) research. Yet it is agreed that more systematic observation of current industrial phenomena is necessary to help managers deal with their problems. Hence, the aim of this paper is to provide an example to help guide other researchers on using GTM for theory building in OM research.Design/methodology/approach A GTM study in the German automot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature acknowledges that the complex and dynamic world situations in which organisations are embedded in call for less "hypothesis testing and more systematic observation to help managers deal with their actual problems" (Hayes, 2000: in Binder andEdwards, 2010: p. 233). In this vein, it is fruitful for the study of process improvement interventions to utilise theories that help to explain phenomena as they unfold over time, as well as the relationships between the participants who shape and are shaped by these phenomena (Binder and Edwards, 2010;Filippini, 1997). This makes explicit the need to deploy qualitative case study methods (Voss et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature acknowledges that the complex and dynamic world situations in which organisations are embedded in call for less "hypothesis testing and more systematic observation to help managers deal with their actual problems" (Hayes, 2000: in Binder andEdwards, 2010: p. 233). In this vein, it is fruitful for the study of process improvement interventions to utilise theories that help to explain phenomena as they unfold over time, as well as the relationships between the participants who shape and are shaped by these phenomena (Binder and Edwards, 2010;Filippini, 1997). This makes explicit the need to deploy qualitative case study methods (Voss et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De cara al proceso de comparación entre casos e inferencia destinado a responder a las proposiciones de trabajo enunciadas, de claro carácter exploratorio, se utilizó el método de la teorización anclada (Grounded theory method), que se integra de forma adecuada con la metodología general de estudio de casos (Binder y Edwards, 2010). Se trata de un método de análisis inductivo con una fuerte potencialidad en fenómenos sociales complejos como el que nos ocupa, que ha sido utilizado con éxito en investigaciones previas de este ámbito (Boiral, 2003;Boiral, 2007).…”
Section: Tabla II Resumen De La Labor De Trabajo De Campo Realizada Eunclassified
“…At the same time there is an industry of qualitative data analysis, for a review see (Binder & Edwards, 2010;di Gregorio, 2003;Fendt & Sachs, 2008;Glaser & Strauss, 1967;Hutchison, Johnston, & Breckon, 2010;MacMillan & Koenig, 2004;Partington, 2000;Pearse & Kanyangale, 2009;Strauss & Corbin, 1998). It has been argued that a postmodern interpretation of data views the world as text and thus subject to narrative analysis (White & Taket, 1994).…”
Section: Overview Of Qualitative Data Analysis Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%