2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232314814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Genomic Variation to Distinguish Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma from Benign Fallopian Tubes

Abstract: The preoperative diagnosis of pelvic masses has been elusive to date. Methods for characterization such as CA-125 have had limited specificity. We hypothesize that genomic variation can be used to create prediction models which accurately distinguish high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) from benign tissue. Methods: In this retrospective, pilot study, we extracted DNA and RNA from HGSC specimens and from benign fallopian tubes. Then, we performed whole exome sequencing and RNA sequencing, and identified sing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we describe a multivariate lasso regression model that distinguishes HGSC and EEC with the determination of SNVs in a single gene with high performance (measured in AUC). Previous work from our laboratory has confirmed that high-performance models for detection of HGSC are possible with SNV analysis [13]. However, the overarching goal of this study was not to detect HGSC and EEC SNVs but to determine the association between this genomic variation and changes in microbial communities in neoplastic tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, we describe a multivariate lasso regression model that distinguishes HGSC and EEC with the determination of SNVs in a single gene with high performance (measured in AUC). Previous work from our laboratory has confirmed that high-performance models for detection of HGSC are possible with SNV analysis [13]. However, the overarching goal of this study was not to detect HGSC and EEC SNVs but to determine the association between this genomic variation and changes in microbial communities in neoplastic tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…SNVs are some of the most common sources of genomic variation in cancer. SNVs can also be distinctive of each cancer, so much so that patterns of SNVs could be used to create models that would discriminate cancerous tissue from benign tissue [ 13 ]. In the present study, we characterized patterns of somatic SNVs, detected with the best recommended practices of genome sequencing [ 35 ], from HGSC and EEC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the work by Erickson et al, 28 p53 mutations were determined in blood isolated from tampons of patients with or without high-grade serous carcinoma, and although all eight high-grade serous carcinoma tumors harbored a p53 mutation in the tumor, only three of the eight blood samples from tampons showed the mutation. In the Gonzalez-Bosquet et al report, 29 a model of 49 single nucleotide variants had excellent performance with an AUC of 1.0 in distinguishing high-grade serous carcinoma from benign fallopian tube; models with 11 copy number variants (AUC 0.87) and 17 structural variants (AUC 0.73) performed more poorly. In the study by Vanderstichele et al, 30 chromosomal copy number from cell-free DNA was examined in a total of 112 patients (44 healthy control group, 57 high-grade serous carcinomas or borderline, 11 benign), and they reported a specificity of 99.6% and sensitivity of 78% when benign tumors were compared with high-grade serous carcinoma tumors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%