2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-003-1637-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using genetic algorithms on facilities layout problems

Abstract: This article utilises a scheme to solve both equal and unequal area department problems in facilities layout by using genetic algorithms (GAs) for achieving the minimal total layout cost (TLC). With regards the equal area department problems, the objective function is mainly developed according to the measurement of the material flow factor cost (MFFC). However, the objective function for unequal area department problems in this study is a multiple objective function involving MFFC, shape ratio factor, and are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dunker et al (2003) used a GA to solve the FLP with unequal area fixed shape departments [31]. Michael and Wang (2004) utilized a scheme to solve both equal and unequal area department problems in facilities layout by using genetic algorithms [32]. Wang et al (2005) are focused on the unequal areas' department facilities layout problem and implement analysis of variance (ANOVA) of statistics to find out the best site size of layout by genetic algorithm [33].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dunker et al (2003) used a GA to solve the FLP with unequal area fixed shape departments [31]. Michael and Wang (2004) utilized a scheme to solve both equal and unequal area department problems in facilities layout by using genetic algorithms [32]. Wang et al (2005) are focused on the unequal areas' department facilities layout problem and implement analysis of variance (ANOVA) of statistics to find out the best site size of layout by genetic algorithm [33].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last row shows the number of the best solutions obtained from each heuristic. The bold numbers indicate the best objective function value (OFV) obtained for each test problem The bolded numbers signify the optimum answer for each problem In summary, the TS-NM, TSbasic, TSall, PTS, DP, SA_EG, GA, HAS, and SA heuristics obtained the best solutions for 32,12,16,14,13,13,10,10,16, and 16 of the 32 problems, respectively. Therefore, the TS-NM heuristic clearly outperformed all the other heuristics for this data set with respect to with respect to other heuristics…”
Section: Comparison and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the level of utilization of the area is measured only in terms of free available area (Hu and Wang 2004). Likewise, Lin and Sharp (1999) use two measures to calculate the utilization area: proportion of free area, and the free distribution area in the workshop or work place.…”
Section: Productive Area Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the reduction of the activities minimizes the corresponding production time and the MHC, which are two of the objectives of an efficient layout (Hu and Wang 2004). However, there are three deficiencies in the methods:…”
Section: Proximitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mir et al [18] presented a based hybrid optimization approach for unequal area facilities design and concluded that the hybrid technique can efficiently produce high-quality layouts for large-scale problems involving unequal area facilities. Hu and Wang [19] applied GA to unequal area facility layout problems to achieve the minimal total layout cost. The objective function in the current study is a multiple-objective function involving material flow factor cost, shape ratio factor, and area utilization factor.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%