2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using generic and content-specific teaching practices in teacher evaluation: An exploratory study of teachers' perceptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that, for instance, the distinction between the three factors of instructional quality, teacher support, cognitive activation, and classroom management should be reflected in students' perceptions. But current research suggests that this distinction is not perfect and may impose the coexistence between general and specific factors (e.g., Charalambous et al, 2014 ). As a consequence, traditional measurement models may not fully represent the conceptualization of perceived instructional quality, pointing to the need for flexible modeling approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This implies that, for instance, the distinction between the three factors of instructional quality, teacher support, cognitive activation, and classroom management should be reflected in students' perceptions. But current research suggests that this distinction is not perfect and may impose the coexistence between general and specific factors (e.g., Charalambous et al, 2014 ). As a consequence, traditional measurement models may not fully represent the conceptualization of perceived instructional quality, pointing to the need for flexible modeling approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Besides addressing the conceptual overlap between the factors of instructional quality, researchers also pose the question of the extent to which ratings of the classroom environment represent general or specific perceptions of instruction—that is, is there a “halo effect” on students' ratings of instruction or can they well differentiate between different aspects such as the three factors of instructional quality (e.g., Harlen, 2006 ; Charalambous et al, 2014 )? Hence, the question arises whether students are generally able to distinguish between the different factors of instructional quality in their ratings (specific factors) or they only provide overall ratings of instruction irrespective of these factors (general factor).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with standardized tests, which often measure low-level skills (Resnick et al 2004), classroom observation instruments are often grounded in a theory of instruction aligned with conceptually oriented instruction, emphasizing the quality of teacher-student interactions and the development of content understanding via engagement in cognitively demanding activities (Grossman et al 2014;Seidel and Shavelson 2007). Content-generic instruments (e.g., Framework for Teaching [Danielson 2011]; CLASS [Pianta et al 2010]) are designed to assess instructional interactions across subject areas, whereas contentspecific instruments assess subject-specific instructional quality (Charalambous et al 2014). Examples of mathematics-content-specific instruments include the Instructional Quality Assessment (IQA; Boston 2012), which is rooted in research on challenging mathematical tasks and maintaining cognitive demand (e.g., Stein and Lane 1996).…”
Section: Theory Of Instruction and Student Learning Underpinning The Mqimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be recognized that for some chemical engineering students such a course is quite challenging and perhaps a longer, more leisurely course may be better for learning [16]. Some topics introduced are by necessity advanced, for example "accounting for the pressure term".…”
Section: Instructor Viewsmentioning
confidence: 99%