2012
DOI: 10.1126/science.1216379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation

Abstract: Phenotypic variation is ubiquitous in biology and is often traceable to underlying genetic and environmental variation. However, even genetically identical cells in identical environments display variable phenotypes. Stochastic gene expression, or gene expression ‘noise’, has been suggested as a major source of this variability, and its physiological consequences have been topics of intense research for the last decade. Several recent studies have measured variability in protein and mRNA levels, and have disco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

30
721
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 730 publications
(764 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
30
721
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated above, the levels of CLK per cell are similar in ClkWT and ClkSV40 flies; however, due to the strong post-transcriptional regulation provided by the Clk 3 0 UTR, the same levels of protein are achieved by much lower transcriptional activity of the Clk promoter in ClkSV40 flies. In agreement with the established inverse relationship between transcriptional levels and noise [52][53][54][55] , our model predicted that in ClkSV40 flies CLK-driven activity would be more sensitive to transcriptional noise and hence more variable. Clk is involved in the development of the circadian neurons as well as in the control of accurate circadian transcription.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As stated above, the levels of CLK per cell are similar in ClkWT and ClkSV40 flies; however, due to the strong post-transcriptional regulation provided by the Clk 3 0 UTR, the same levels of protein are achieved by much lower transcriptional activity of the Clk promoter in ClkSV40 flies. In agreement with the established inverse relationship between transcriptional levels and noise [52][53][54][55] , our model predicted that in ClkSV40 flies CLK-driven activity would be more sensitive to transcriptional noise and hence more variable. Clk is involved in the development of the circadian neurons as well as in the control of accurate circadian transcription.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Second, many cellular processes can interfere with gene expression through internal feedback loops whose effects are hard to predict. Third, the process of gene expression shows significant levels of noise (16)(17)(18). Given these limitations, novel experimental strategies are required to gain quantitative, real-time control of gene expression in vivo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms underlying gene expression heterogeneity in the pluripotent state are still not well understood, and evidence suggests that gene fluctuations could arise from stochastic noise in gene expression regulatory mechanisms 18, 19, 20, 21. These fluctuations in gene expression are possible due to a permissive chromatin configuration across the genome of PSCs 22, allowing stochastic expression of lineage‐specific and differentiation‐promoting genes even before cell‐fate commitment 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%