1993
DOI: 10.1093/sjaf/17.3.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Fractal Geometry to Quantify Loblolly Pine Seedling Root System Architecture

Abstract: Fractal geometry is a simple method of quantifying and describing complex shapes often found in nature (Mandelbrot 1983). The spatial arrangement of pine seedling roots is complex and not easily quantified. In this paper we report on a method for quantifying seedling roots based on concepts of fractal geometry. Ten 1+0 bareroot seedlings of each of three grades of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) were obtained from two Virginia Department of Forestry nurseries. The fractal dimension (D) was estima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Values of D in crop species range from 1.24 to 1.58 (Tatsumi et al 1989;Fitter and Stickland 1992;Eghball et al 1993). In the present study, D was less than 1.4, similar to that calculated for the evergreen coniferous tree, Pinus taeda (Dieball and Feret 1993), indicative of a relatively simple root structure (Fitter and Stickland 1992). There was no significant difference between evergreen species and deciduous species when each pair of species was pooled.…”
Section: α and D Valuessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Values of D in crop species range from 1.24 to 1.58 (Tatsumi et al 1989;Fitter and Stickland 1992;Eghball et al 1993). In the present study, D was less than 1.4, similar to that calculated for the evergreen coniferous tree, Pinus taeda (Dieball and Feret 1993), indicative of a relatively simple root structure (Fitter and Stickland 1992). There was no significant difference between evergreen species and deciduous species when each pair of species was pooled.…”
Section: α and D Valuessupporting
confidence: 80%