2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using formative evaluation methods to improve clinical implementation efforts: Description and an example

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As we all know, monthly exams can improve students' adherence to teachers' guidance and their motivation and performance. Inspired by the successful practice of formative evaluation in teaching and patient care fields, [28][29][30] we adopted once-monthly ACT to identify its potential and actual influences on patients' adherence to and treatment effects of inhalant therapy. The self-reported ACT questionnaire was used as not only an evaluation tool of asthma control for all patients, also the specific intervention for self-management of medication adherence of asthma patients specifically in the observation group in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we all know, monthly exams can improve students' adherence to teachers' guidance and their motivation and performance. Inspired by the successful practice of formative evaluation in teaching and patient care fields, [28][29][30] we adopted once-monthly ACT to identify its potential and actual influences on patients' adherence to and treatment effects of inhalant therapy. The self-reported ACT questionnaire was used as not only an evaluation tool of asthma control for all patients, also the specific intervention for self-management of medication adherence of asthma patients specifically in the observation group in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, research participants could be purposively sampled from each stakeholder group to complete surveys or qualitative interviews of their perspectives on the implementation process. 19 Many SGM health researchers are likely familiar with engaging members of the population in the research process, which is a shared goal in community-based participatory research. 20 In implementation science, there is added emphasis on including all stakeholders relevant to the implementation process, beyond the recipient (e.g., patient) population.…”
Section: Potential Delays In Evidence-based Mental Health Care Reachimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Final version of the VR application obtained from the formative evaluation (FE) to identify potential and actual influences on the implementation process [31]. The FE conducted through testing the application by the experts, namely software expert and material expert, then they fill out the questionnaires that designed at the Table 1 and Table 2.…”
Section: Formative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%