2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using formal methods for content validation of medical procedure documents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, errors of omission occur because a certain tacit or technical knowledge is assumed in the document. Details of conflict, dependency and rule sequence analysis can be found in Cota et al (2017) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In most cases, errors of omission occur because a certain tacit or technical knowledge is assumed in the document. Details of conflict, dependency and rule sequence analysis can be found in Cota et al (2017) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Content validation - Content validation refers to the judgment of the quality of the description of the tool (script) or, in other words, if it covers all the actions included in the proposed procedure (intralesional infiltration) and does not contain elements (or actions) related to other procedures. A formal content evaluation method ( Ribeiro et al 2014 ) - a previously validated tool for verification of software specification documents - was applied ( Cota et al 2017 ). This method was developed by computer scientists from Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, and it is based on six steps:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey instrument was developed with reference to other cross-sectional studies on disease awareness and prevention (Fryar et al, 2017 were developed with the 3 main languages used among the communities" various ethnic groups, including English, Malay, and Chinese. Both content and translation validation were conducted (Cota et al, 2017) , (Zamanzadeh et al, 2015). Translation validation was performed for the questionnaires in 3 different languages.…”
Section: Pre-post Survey Of Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restriction to monic matches is often justified by specific applications under consideration (e.g. [17]), and as discussed in [32] it may even increase the expressiveness of the formalism (according to a suitable notion of generated language of graphs). However, to simulate the transformation steps obtained by a given rule and arbitrary matches using monic matches only, the price to pay is to add to the system all "quotients" (epimorphic images) of the original rule [32], which may hinder the applicability of dependency analysis to the system.…”
Section: Definition 27 (Categories Of Graphs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we obtain from the M-initial pushout over q 2 , as in diagram (17), the following proto-essence:…”
Section: The Essence Of Conflicting Transformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%