2010 Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/apsec.2010.54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Faults-Slip-Through Metric as a Predictor of Fault-Proneness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3: Logistic Regression is generally appropriate when the dependent variable is dichotomous (e.g. either fault-prone or non-fault-prone) [42] …”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3: Logistic Regression is generally appropriate when the dependent variable is dichotomous (e.g. either fault-prone or non-fault-prone) [42] …”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) Logistic Regression, LR: Afzal [28] recommend LR when the dependent variable is dichotomous (e.g. either faultprone or non-fault-prone).…”
Section: Prediction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Logistic Regression (LR): Afzal [33] describes LR as a method to be used when the dependent variable is dichotomous (e.g. either fault-prone or non-faultprone).…”
Section: B Defect Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%