2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Eye Tracking to Identify Learner Differences in Example Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be also interpreted as less strategic in the exploration. These results are in agreement with the findings of Ball et al (2004) and Najar et al (2015) on the advantage of strategic approach in design exploration. A schema-driven approach in example search can be more desirable in a design-related task and our study demonstrates it in terms of the understanding of the design space.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be also interpreted as less strategic in the exploration. These results are in agreement with the findings of Ball et al (2004) and Najar et al (2015) on the advantage of strategic approach in design exploration. A schema-driven approach in example search can be more desirable in a design-related task and our study demonstrates it in terms of the understanding of the design space.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In their study, experts show more schema-driven use of examples than case-driven, with respect to novices. Najar et al (2015) show that the students with higher levels of knowledge pay more attention to the schema of the data than the weaker students. Our interest lies in the same domain as these studies.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 85%