2017
DOI: 10.1109/tiv.2017.2768219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Extreme Value Theory for Vehicle Level Safety Validation and Implications for Autonomous Vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An accelerated approach using Extreme Value Theory is presented by Åsljung et al [90], [91]. Based on real data and a criticality metric, the safety level of the system is predicted using near misses.…”
Section: B Sampling From Parameter Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An accelerated approach using Extreme Value Theory is presented by Åsljung et al [90], [91]. Based on real data and a criticality metric, the safety level of the system is predicted using near misses.…”
Section: B Sampling From Parameter Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They note that the prediction depends considerably on the criticality metric used. Their results in [91] show that the Brake Threat Number is a promising criticality metric. According to them, this approach requires 45 times less measurement data than a statistical approach.…”
Section: B Sampling From Parameter Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter, the BM approach was used to analyse the safety of signalised intersections, using data collected with video cameras in 18 locations for 8 h. Some years later, Zheng et al in 2014 [15,16] applied both BM and POT approaches to assess the safety of lane-change manoeuvres in freeways; collecting data with video cameras in 29 locations for ∼3 h. EVT applications to road safety involved the use of driving simulator to collect data, as in the case of Tarko [8], who investigated road departures with POT approach; Farah and Azevedo [3], who analysed head-on collision during passing manoeuvres with both BM and POT approaches; and lastly, Orsini et al [17], who dealt with entering-circulating collisions in roundabouts with both BM and POT approaches. There have also been examples of naturalistic driving experiments, as in the case of Jonasson and Rootzen [18], who analysed rear-end crashes and Asljung et al [19], who analysed the safety of autonomous vehicles.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has proposed methods aimed at reducing the amount of realworld testing required from manufacturers. Such methods include testing in virtual and hardware-in-the-loop simulations, limiting the scope of real-world testing to safety-critical scenarios, and using threat measures from near-collisions to quantify system safety [1], [30], [35]- [37].…”
Section: Application To Autonomous Vehiclesmentioning
confidence: 99%