2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using expert informed GIS to locate important marine social-ecological hotspots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different researchers have used different methods to identify statistically significant hotspots in spatial data (Anderson, 2009;Benedek et al, 2016;Chicas et al, 2016;Lauren , 2012;Mahboubi et al, 2015). Popular methods include Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), which is well suited for point datasets.…”
Section: Getis Ord For Oil Spills Hot Spot Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different researchers have used different methods to identify statistically significant hotspots in spatial data (Anderson, 2009;Benedek et al, 2016;Chicas et al, 2016;Lauren , 2012;Mahboubi et al, 2015). Popular methods include Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), which is well suited for point datasets.…”
Section: Getis Ord For Oil Spills Hot Spot Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the z-score, regions with an absolute value greater than 1.96 were considered clustering regions (hot or cool spots). Areas with an absolute value less than 1.96 were considered nonsignificant (Mahboubi et al, 2015).…”
Section: Definition Of Regions With Various Lst Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some participatory approaches use mapping to enable stakeholder-driven weighted ratings of spatial ecosystem service provision, in turn highlighting important areas of special social and ecological importance which conventional service mapping cannot detect [106,107]. However, participatory approaches need to be underpinned by appropriate resources including sufficient time to explain methods, protocols and to build up stakeholder relationships, but when applied sensitively they can facilitate community-based catchment management by legitimising, analysing and representing local knowledge [108].…”
Section: Participatory Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catchment management has benefitted from recognition that such approaches help to build consensus and share wider perspectives to inform the decision-making process, but a more comprehensive understanding of the variability of viewpoints associated with decision-makers and beneficiaries of catchment management is needed, and across multiple spatial and temporal scales [116]. Innovation in stakeholder engagement methodologies will help to underpin this need for improved understanding as participatory research continues to evolve to take advantage of more engaging and mutually beneficial approaches such as participatory modelling and the co-production of knowledge [107,117]. More in-depth analysis of the characteristics of successful participatory modelling and research are clearly needed to help overcome the cultural, economic and technical constraints that can hinder effective engagement and participatory research.…”
Section: Transdisciplinary Research and Stakeholder Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%