2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using European naturalistic driving data to assess secondary task engagement when stopped at a red light

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, it should be pointed out that, even though participants’ selection and description of ‘appropriate’ contexts for texting appears to be somewhat reasonable, it is questionable if they would be able to finish the text message within the same context. Morgenstern et al [18] analysed texting when stopped at a red light with the help of naturalistic driving data, and found that in more than half of all cases, texting that occurred during a red light phase was continued even after the car started to move again. In 33% of these cases, it took the drivers at least 10 s (and often more than 1 min) until they finally stopped to text.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it should be pointed out that, even though participants’ selection and description of ‘appropriate’ contexts for texting appears to be somewhat reasonable, it is questionable if they would be able to finish the text message within the same context. Morgenstern et al [18] analysed texting when stopped at a red light with the help of naturalistic driving data, and found that in more than half of all cases, texting that occurred during a red light phase was continued even after the car started to move again. In 33% of these cases, it took the drivers at least 10 s (and often more than 1 min) until they finally stopped to text.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%