1989
DOI: 10.3109/02699208908985275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using EPG to investigate speech errors and motor agility in a dyspraxic patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This emphasis encouraged some to view it as a phonological impairment. This description is compatible with other reports (Blumstein and Baum, 1987;Kent and Rosenbek, 1983;Edwards and Miller, 1989). Several recent reports converge on a central finding of motor impairment.…”
Section: Sensory Trajectories and Motor Commands For Speechsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This emphasis encouraged some to view it as a phonological impairment. This description is compatible with other reports (Blumstein and Baum, 1987;Kent and Rosenbek, 1983;Edwards and Miller, 1989). Several recent reports converge on a central finding of motor impairment.…”
Section: Sensory Trajectories and Motor Commands For Speechsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Since then EPG has been used in the field of acquired adult neurological disorders (Edwards and Miller, 1989), cleft palate (Gibbon and Hardcastle, 1989), glossectomy (Barry and Timmermann, 1985) and dysfluency (Harrington, 1987). The potential use of the EPG with deaf people remained an unexplored area, until steps were taken by Fletcher, Dagenais andCritz-Crosby (1991), andHasegawa (1983).…”
Section: Rachael Cra Wfordmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Prior investigations utilising EPG as an assessment tool in adults have focused primarily on the description of the speech disorder under investigation and have paid little attention to comparisons with normative data, particularly normal data pertaining to intra-subject variability (4,9,10,19,23). Only three studies (3,10,19) have described normal patterns of articulatory contact in adult speakers, however, these studies have not quantitatively investigated the degrees of variability that could be expected from normal speech.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%