2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using embedded assessments to promote pedagogical reasoning among secondary teaching candidates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This validates the scoring by local facultydthey can identify higher quality instructional practices for student teachers that translate into performance outcomes for first-year teachers. Conversely, the locally-scored performance assessments were systematically higher than official scores and did not reliably identify high and low scoring candidates (Youngs & Bird, 2010). Taken together, these predictive validity and reliability results are comparable to findings from in-service teacher evaluation research which indicate that evaluation ratings are significantly associated with other teacher performance outcomes (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…This validates the scoring by local facultydthey can identify higher quality instructional practices for student teachers that translate into performance outcomes for first-year teachers. Conversely, the locally-scored performance assessments were systematically higher than official scores and did not reliably identify high and low scoring candidates (Youngs & Bird, 2010). Taken together, these predictive validity and reliability results are comparable to findings from in-service teacher evaluation research which indicate that evaluation ratings are significantly associated with other teacher performance outcomes (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…However, two challenges have emerged out of the developmental perspective on the TESOL practicum. One is the quality of supervision by teacher educators (Bailey, 2006;Farrell, 2007Farrell, , 2008bOchieng'Ong'ondo & Borg, 2011;Tang, 2003;Youngs & Bird, 2010) and the other is how to make the practicum a real learning opportunity for student teachers' professional growth (Richards, 1998).…”
Section: Challenges Of the Tesol Practicummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desde esta perspectiva, y en la línea de lo planteado por Dewey (1989) respecto a la necesidad de que la base experiencial del conocimiento profesional sea informada por las teorías existentes, se observa en la literatura una perspectiva que releva esta necesidad de contar con una base sólida de conocimiento que debe estar disponible para la reflexión (CONCHA et al, 2013;DARLING-HAMMOND;BRANSFORD, 2005;KAASILA;LAURIALA, 2012;MARCOS;SÁNCHEZ;TILLEMA, 2011;SCHÖN, 1983;YAFFE, 2010;YOUNGS;BIRD, 2010 Entre los estudios que tensionan el rol estructurador del tutor y entre los que complementan dicho rol con otras herramientas que ayuden al desarrollo del pensamiento reflexivo, se observa el uso de herramientas que son identificadas como portadoras de potencial andamiaje intrínseco para el desarrollo reflexivo, como el análisis de videos (BLOMBERG et al, 2014;CHUNG;VAN ES, 2014), las videogafas (YAFFE, 2010), o las animaciones (MOORE-RUSSO; WILSEY, 2014). Algunos estudios que las incluyeron proveen evidencias a favor de su uso para el desarrollo reflexivo, sin embargo, estas experiencias no evaluaron estas modalidades en diseños controlados; mientras que otras experiencias que las incluyeron no obtuvieron resultados particularmente favorables a su uso (GELFUSO; DENNIS, 2014), Sin embargo, es importante considerar que un grupo de estudios que aporta evidencia desfavorable al andamiaje (DANIEL; AUHL; HASTINGS, 2013;GELFUSO;DENNIS, 2014;OAKLEY;PEGRUM;JONSTON, 2014), reconocen en su diseño debilidades de validez interna, en el control de la intervención.…”
Section: Lo Que Se Sabeunclassified