2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13002-017-0159-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Ellenberg-Pignatti values to estimate habitat preferences of wild food and medicinal plants: an example from northeastern Istria (Croatia)

Abstract: BackgroundThe paper presents the first ethnobotanical application of Ellenberg indicator values, which are widely used in European plant ecology. The aim of the study was to find out if Ellenberg values (indicating habitat preferences) differ for wild food and medicinal plants used in north-eastern Istria (Croatia). We used Ellenberg-Pignatti values (the version of Ellenberg values used in this part of Europe).MethodsFifty semi-structured interviews were carried out among local key informants, asking which wil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(19 reference statements)
3
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The list of wild vegetables used is very typical for the Mediterranean areas of Europe [15, 16, 26, 42, 4756]. It is also similar to those recorded in other parts of Croatia [1924].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The list of wild vegetables used is very typical for the Mediterranean areas of Europe [15, 16, 26, 42, 4756]. It is also similar to those recorded in other parts of Croatia [1924].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The observed degree of overlap between food and medicinal plants is very typical in other areas of Europe [36][37][38][39][40][41]. Particularly similar are the results from a study in Istria (also in pericoastal but inland Croatia) [36], where, out of 121 species, 31 species are used exclusively in a food context, 50 species are used exclusively as medicine, and 40 species overlap (i.e., 33%). This is nearly identical to our study, where, out of 123 plant taxa, 41 are used exclusively for treating a variety of ailments, 43 exclusively as food, and 42 as both food and medicine (i.e., 34%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…It is widely used both in Europe and adjacent territories (Kalusová et al, 2016;Berg et al, 2017;Britton et al, 2017;Čeplová et al, 2017;Chmura et al, 2017;Hülber et al, 2017;Muir, 2017;Pruchniewicz, 2017;Santini et al, 2017;Johansen et al, 2018;Roeling et al, 2018). Its modern version was supplemented and adapted by many foreign authors (Douda et al, 2016;Dyderski et al, 2016;Ewald & Ziche, 2016;Koch et al, 2016;Van Dobben & de Vries, 2016;Elst et al, 2017;Mitchell et al, 2017;Vitasović Kosić et al, 2017;Kılıç et al, 2018;Kosanic et al, 2018).…”
Section: History Of Phytoindication Scales and Ecomorph Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%