2017
DOI: 10.12989/cac.2017.19.4.347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using element-embedded rebar model in ANSYS for the study of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The brick concrete element accommodates defining steel reinforcement by means of smeared or discrete rebars and hence can be used to model concretes with or without reinforcing rebars [46,47]. There are additional optional concrete-based material parameters that can be used to finetune element's behavior, such as concrete shear transfer coefficients, tensile stress, and compressive strength.…”
Section: Considerations For Element Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The brick concrete element accommodates defining steel reinforcement by means of smeared or discrete rebars and hence can be used to model concretes with or without reinforcing rebars [46,47]. There are additional optional concrete-based material parameters that can be used to finetune element's behavior, such as concrete shear transfer coefficients, tensile stress, and compressive strength.…”
Section: Considerations For Element Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another line involving finite element models in the ANSYS software is based on the development of new finite elements (solid and plane) using user programmable features, which allow the inclusion of new material models that are not available in the library. Lazzari et al (2017) used these features to develop elastoplastic and viscoelastoplastic constitutive models, combined with the Ottosen (1997) failure criterion for prediction of the behaviour of reinforced and prestressed concrete [18] [19]. The present work presents a case study of a column with non-usual cross-section used in a Brazilian popular housing project of buildings with up to four floors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UMAT procedure is called in every Gauss point and has to update: the stress vector, the internal variables and the material stiffness matrix. User procedures are common in scientific research [ 32 , 51 , 53 ], since they enable the user to focus on a specific phenomenon and the rest of the numerical model can be covered with algorithms available in the FEM code.…”
Section: Proposed Solution Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case study 3 concerns the failure of beam OA-1 without stirrups in shear, which was one of the series tested by Bresler and Scordelis [ 66 ]. This is a classic benchmark for validating new NLFEA strategies for RC structures [ 17 , 18 , 53 , 67 , 68 ]. Due to the popularity of this experimental data, beams with similar material parameters and dimensions were re-examined by Vecchio and Shim [ 69 ].…”
Section: Verification and Validation Of The Proposed Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%