2012
DOI: 10.1378/chest.1386290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Electronic Health Record Data to Develop and Validate a Prediction Model for Adverse Outcomes on the Wards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This renewed investigation of hemodynamic parameters by Raimundo et al (23) is refreshing and fits with a recent call to better understand the physiology of AKI and to not solely rely on biochemical biomarkers (27). This continued exploration of hemodynamic and physiologic parameters mirrors other efforts in critical care medicine, where there is a renewed focus on vital signs and other parameters to help risk stratify and prevent adverse patient outcomes (28,29). Although it is important to stress the need for prospective validation of these data, as a field we can remain hopeful that follow-up investigations will validate the findings of Raimundo et al Additional investigation may even expand the window for intervention and modification of the AKI trajectory to a period of time longer than the initial 12 golden hours reported in this study (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This renewed investigation of hemodynamic parameters by Raimundo et al (23) is refreshing and fits with a recent call to better understand the physiology of AKI and to not solely rely on biochemical biomarkers (27). This continued exploration of hemodynamic and physiologic parameters mirrors other efforts in critical care medicine, where there is a renewed focus on vital signs and other parameters to help risk stratify and prevent adverse patient outcomes (28,29). Although it is important to stress the need for prospective validation of these data, as a field we can remain hopeful that follow-up investigations will validate the findings of Raimundo et al Additional investigation may even expand the window for intervention and modification of the AKI trajectory to a period of time longer than the initial 12 golden hours reported in this study (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The primary outcomes of interest were the occurrence of critical illness events (defined as a composite of ward cardiac arrest or transfer to ICU), inhospital mortality, and hospital LOS. Cardiac arrests, defined as lack of palpable pulse without resuscitation, were identified using a prospectively validated database maintained by the hospital (Churpek, Yuen, Park, Gibbons, & Edelson, 2014a; Volchenboum et al, 2016). ICU transfer information was derived from the hospital’s admission–discharge–transfer database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adjusted for a number of potential confounders (all calculated using data at the time of admission), including patient severity of illness using the electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (eCART score), a previously published early warning score calculated from vital sign and laboratory result data (Churpek et al, 2014a, 2014b), time of day (day: 7 a.m. to 5 p.m., evening: 5 p.m. to 10 p.m., and night: 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.), weekday versus weekend, year, and the specific ward to which the patient was admitted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant limitation in this setting is the lack of any electronically recorded vital signs in the source data. All identified comparison deterioration models (both traditional [7, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21] and deep-learning [10, 15, 16]) rely on patient vital signs and physiological observations as key predictors. We are therefore also aiming to establish the viability of an alternative for predicting short-term patient deterioration where vital signs observations are not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%