2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using eDNA to develop a national citizen science-based monitoring programme for the great crested newt (Triturus cristatus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
457
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 414 publications
(472 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
11
457
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is increasing evidence that genetic surveillance methods are more sensitive than conventional approaches (Jerde et al 2011;Thomsen et al 2012a, b;Turner et al 2012;Biggs et al 2015;, which means that eDNA detections are possible even when sampling with conventional gear fails-especially at the putative invasion front when target organisms are rare (Darling and Mahon 2011;Jerde et al 2011;Dejean et al 2012). Controlled experiments that directly compare the sensitivity of eDNA sampling and conventional sampling methods when target species are at low abundance would be helpful (Darling and Mahon 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing evidence that genetic surveillance methods are more sensitive than conventional approaches (Jerde et al 2011;Thomsen et al 2012a, b;Turner et al 2012;Biggs et al 2015;, which means that eDNA detections are possible even when sampling with conventional gear fails-especially at the putative invasion front when target organisms are rare (Darling and Mahon 2011;Jerde et al 2011;Dejean et al 2012). Controlled experiments that directly compare the sensitivity of eDNA sampling and conventional sampling methods when target species are at low abundance would be helpful (Darling and Mahon 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the generic nature of some environmental samples, such as water, makes eDNA sampling amenable to automation, and opportunities abound for integrating genomic data collection and analysis with remote sensing technologies that traditionally focus on electromagnetic, acoustic, or other data. These same features may also open the door to conservation and research efforts at unprecedented geographic scales by engaging citizen scientists to aid with environmental sample collection (Biggs et al 2014).…”
Section: Remote and Autonomous Sampling And Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is increasingly being used in quantitative surveys of aquatic ecosystems (Thomsen and Willerslev 2015). eDNA assays often provide improved detectability over traditional survey methods, but they also pose unique challenges including non-standardized protocols, PCR inhibition, and environmental influences on DNA degradation rates (Olson et al 2012;Bohmann et al 2014;Biggs et al 2015). Further, the use of eDNA techniques for the detection of semi-aquatic species in ephemeral wetlands (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%