2018
DOI: 10.1113/jp275580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using dynamic clamp to quantify pathological changes in the excitability of primary somatosensory neurons

Abstract: Key points Primary somatosensory neurons normally respond to somatic depolarization with transient spiking but can switch to repetitive spiking under pathological conditions. This switch in spiking pattern reflects a qualitative change in spike initiation dynamics and contributes to the hyperexcitability associated with chronic pain.Neurons can be converted to repetitive spiking by adding a virtual conductance using dynamic clamp. By titrating the conductance to determine how much must be added to cause repeti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 57 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The +4 mV liquid junction potential (calculated in Clampex 10) (Vasylyev & Waxman, 2012) between pipette and bath solutions was not compensated. Small DRG neurons (soma diameter 25–30 μm; 27.4 ± 1.4 μm, mean ± SD, n = 24) at 3–7 days in vitro were dynamically clamped (Kemenes et al., 2011; Samu et al., 2012; Sharp et al., 1993a, 1993b; Takkala & Prescott, 2018; Vasylyev et al., 2014) in a whole‐cell configuration using the same pipettes and solutions as for the voltage‐clamp recordings. Ion channel kinetics models were obtained from voltage‐clamp recordings with uncompensated liquid junction potential; however, utilization of these models with dynamic‐clamp was still appropriate since the same liquid junction potential was equally uncompensated both in voltage‐clamp and dynamic‐clamp recordings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The +4 mV liquid junction potential (calculated in Clampex 10) (Vasylyev & Waxman, 2012) between pipette and bath solutions was not compensated. Small DRG neurons (soma diameter 25–30 μm; 27.4 ± 1.4 μm, mean ± SD, n = 24) at 3–7 days in vitro were dynamically clamped (Kemenes et al., 2011; Samu et al., 2012; Sharp et al., 1993a, 1993b; Takkala & Prescott, 2018; Vasylyev et al., 2014) in a whole‐cell configuration using the same pipettes and solutions as for the voltage‐clamp recordings. Ion channel kinetics models were obtained from voltage‐clamp recordings with uncompensated liquid junction potential; however, utilization of these models with dynamic‐clamp was still appropriate since the same liquid junction potential was equally uncompensated both in voltage‐clamp and dynamic‐clamp recordings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%