Advances in DUNE 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28589-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Dune-PDELab for Two-Phase Flow in Porous Media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed code was tested by comparing wetting phase saturation and pressure profiles along the x-axis after 180 and 360 days in Figure 4. The results are then compared with two other solutions, namely the DUNE-PDELAB as a software with interior DG method without H(div) projection as described in (Grüninger, 2012), and a 3D element free Galerkin (EFG) method as described in Samimi and Pak (2014). We found excellent agreement between our results (both high order and linear schemes) and others, in particular the EFG method results.…”
Section: Verification Testsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The developed code was tested by comparing wetting phase saturation and pressure profiles along the x-axis after 180 and 360 days in Figure 4. The results are then compared with two other solutions, namely the DUNE-PDELAB as a software with interior DG method without H(div) projection as described in (Grüninger, 2012), and a 3D element free Galerkin (EFG) method as described in Samimi and Pak (2014). We found excellent agreement between our results (both high order and linear schemes) and others, in particular the EFG method results.…”
Section: Verification Testsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…). The wetting-phase pressure-saturation profiles along the x-axis after 180 and 360 days, are plotted in Figure 5, where the results of two other The pressure (left) and saturation(right) profiles along the x-axis at 180 and 360 days , results of proposed model compared to Grüninger (2012) and Samimi and Pak (2014) 296 HFF 26,1 models, namely DUNE-PDELAB a software with interior DG method without H(div) projection (Grüninger, 2012), and a 3D fully implicit model using a different formulation (P w − P n ) (Samimi and Pak, 2014) are also super imposed. It should be noted that the later has used a different numerical scheme, namely element free Galerkin (EFG) method.…”
Section: Backley-leverett Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure5. The pressure (left) and saturation(right) profiles along the x-axis at 180 and 360 days , results of proposed model compared toGrüninger (2012) andSamimi and Pak (2014) …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%