2014
DOI: 10.7763/ijmmm.2014.v2.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Double Pressure Heat Recovery Steam Generator Equipped with Duct Burner for Full Repowering a Steam Power Plant and Its Analysis by Exergy Method

Abstract: Abstract-Repowering is defined as adding gas turbine unit(s) to steam cycle and using exhaust gases to increase cycle efficiency. Repowering methods are divided into two main ways: full repowering and partial repowering. In this research Be'sat steam power plant in Tehran has been considered as reference steam power plant. This old power plant has been designed by General Electric Corporation with 31.46% efficiency, whereas its current efficiency is 26.81%. In this research by using full repowering a combined … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, EES has been widely used for numerous academic and engineering purposes. For example, it has been employed for analyses of double pressure steam boilers having duct burners for a repowering power plant, and for analyzing the overall performance of gas turbines [28,29]. Additionally, it has been used for evaluation of several GT components and various combined cycle power plants to consider exergy destruction [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, EES has been widely used for numerous academic and engineering purposes. For example, it has been employed for analyses of double pressure steam boilers having duct burners for a repowering power plant, and for analyzing the overall performance of gas turbines [28,29]. Additionally, it has been used for evaluation of several GT components and various combined cycle power plants to consider exergy destruction [25].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%