2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using DNA Methylation Profiling to Evaluate Biological Age and Longevity Interventions

Abstract: Summary DNA methylation levels of certain CpG sites are thought to reflect the pace of human aging. Here, we developed a robust predictor of mouse biological age based on 90 CpG sites derived from partial blood DNA methylation profiles. The resulting clock correctly determines the age of mouse cohorts, detects the longevity effects of calorie restriction and gene knockouts, and reports rejuvenation of fibroblast-derived iPSCs. The data show that mammalian DNA methylomes are characterized by CpG sites that may … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

25
472
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 323 publications
(498 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(49 reference statements)
25
472
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We assessed age‐related changes in DNA methylation based on reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) of blood of 141 C57BL/6 male mice representing 16 age groups (Petkovich et al., 2017; Table S3). The youngest mice were 3 months old (young adults), and the oldest 35 months old (corresponding to the survival of the remaining 10% animals).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assessed age‐related changes in DNA methylation based on reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) of blood of 141 C57BL/6 male mice representing 16 age groups (Petkovich et al., 2017; Table S3). The youngest mice were 3 months old (young adults), and the oldest 35 months old (corresponding to the survival of the remaining 10% animals).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing was performed using blood from the inferior vena cavae, and details can be found in Supplementary Experimental Procedures. The original data (Petkovich et al., 2017) were deposited to GEO under accession number GEO: GSE80672.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the field has moved toward identifying specific genomic sites and regions with differential methylation in animal models (Maegawa et al 2010) and humans (Rakyan et al 2010). A number of recent reports have provided the first comprehensive analyses of altered DNA methylation with aging in a range of mouse tissues (Cole et al 2017;Hahn et al 2017;Masser et al 2017b;Petkovich et al 2017;Stubbs et al 2017). Human studies have also advanced by examining age-affected tissues (e.g., Zykovich et al 2014) and through the development of a variety of chronological aging Bclocks^ (Hannum et al 2013;Horvath 2013;Weidner et al 2014;Chen et al 2016).…”
Section: Dna Modifications and Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, averages over regions that are 1-10 kb wide provide limited insight into the true pattern of methylation. Furthermore, a number of reports have described basespecific changes in methylation with aging (Maegawa et al 2010;Mangold et al 2017a;Petkovich et al 2017;Stubbs et al 2017). Moreover, given the growing importance of examining methylation at both CG and CH sites, site-specific quantitation is required to differentiate between these two.…”
Section: Base-specificity Of Dna Modificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation