2016
DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2016.1146552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using derived relational responding to model statistics learning across participants with varying degrees of statistics anxiety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effect sizes for 12 individual experiments were large. Only one case had a small effect size-this case was a comparison of pre-and post-computer-based MTS scores in the study by Sandoz and Hebert (2017). This small effect size can be attributed to high pretest scores on the computer-based MTS task (on average only 7% lower than posttest scores), which suggests ceiling effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Effect sizes for 12 individual experiments were large. Only one case had a small effect size-this case was a comparison of pre-and post-computer-based MTS scores in the study by Sandoz and Hebert (2017). This small effect size can be attributed to high pretest scores on the computer-based MTS task (on average only 7% lower than posttest scores), which suggests ceiling effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A number of experiments included in this meta-analysis provided inferential statistics to support conclusions from visual analyses. For example, Sandoz and Hebert (2017) reported the results of a paired-samples t test to show that posttest outcomes were different from pretest outcomes due to treatment rather than sampling error. O'Neill et al (2015) reported the results of a multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) that examined whether there were statistically significant differences between an EBI group and a reading group on a variety of dependent measures.…”
Section: Statistical Conclusion Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present data suggest that it might be necessary to complete at least a certain number of more than/less than relational training trials to substantively impact subsequent performance on indices of mathematics aptitude or ability, although simpler symmetrical relations may still be useful for learning new mathematical terminology (cf. Sandoz & Hebert, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hayes & Stewart, 2016). Several studies with RFT-based interventions have also reported to enhance performance on specific tests such analogical responding (Ruiz & Luciano, 2011), hierarchical responding (Mulhern et al, 2017(Mulhern et al, , 2018, and statistical learning (Sandoz & Hebert, 2017). These studies are typically too small to be generalizable to the broader population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other small-scale relational skills training intervention studies have also reported to enhance scores on various tests of specific cognitive abilities such as analogical responding (Ruiz and Luciano 2011), hierarchical responding (Mulhern et al 2017(Mulhern et al , 2018, statistical learning (Sandoz and Hebert 2017), and, overall general cognitive ability (Parra and Ruiz 2016;Thirus et al 2016;Vizcaíno-Torres et al 2015), though they are typically underpowered. Taken together, however, these studies show some evidence for the utility of relational skills training and that operant abilities are skills through which we adapt to our environments (cf., also O'Hora et al 2008;O'Hora et al 2005;O'Toole et al 2009; also cf., Cassidy et al 2010, for a discussion of how relational skills are related to IQ test items).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%