2018
DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000001776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Deep Learning in Automated Detection of Graft Detachment in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Pilot Study

Abstract: Purpose: To evaluate a deep learning–based method to automatically detect graft detachment (GD) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Methods: In this study, a total of 1172 AS-OCT images (609: attached graft; 563: detached graft) were used to train and test a deep convolutional neural network to automatically detect GD after DMEK surgery in AS-OCT images. GD was defined as a n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We tested the algorithm using 5-fold cross-validation on the dataset containing 11,340 images, maintaining the proportion of samples of each class per fold. This testing process trained 5 distinct algorithms with 9180 (80%) of these images (3420 healthy; 3060 early-stage FECD 2700 late-stage FECD), each holding off a discrete validation block of 2160 (20%) images (720 healthy; 720 early-stage FECD; 720 late-stage FECD) [ 32 , 38 , 39 ]. Mean parameters were calculated from 5 test runs on the corresponding held-off data by comparing the model’s predictions against the ground truth as determined by cornea specialists.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We tested the algorithm using 5-fold cross-validation on the dataset containing 11,340 images, maintaining the proportion of samples of each class per fold. This testing process trained 5 distinct algorithms with 9180 (80%) of these images (3420 healthy; 3060 early-stage FECD 2700 late-stage FECD), each holding off a discrete validation block of 2160 (20%) images (720 healthy; 720 early-stage FECD; 720 late-stage FECD) [ 32 , 38 , 39 ]. Mean parameters were calculated from 5 test runs on the corresponding held-off data by comparing the model’s predictions against the ground truth as determined by cornea specialists.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models are neural networks that are constructed of an input layer (which receives, for example, the OCT image), followed by multiple layers of nonlinear transformations to produce an output (e.g., FECD present or absent) [ 28 ]. So far, few studies have focused specifically on automated detection of corneal disease using AS-OCT compared to retinal diseases and glaucoma [ 32 ]. To the best of our knowledge, there is no report on the use of deep learning for diagnosing FECD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior image analysis work within the realm of DMEK detachment has only focused on binary classification; i.e. whether detachment is present or not 34 and whether rebubbling was performed. 35 We believe our detachment model is of clinical value as it provides quantitative measures about length and location of graft detachment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of a larger residual interface fluid volume by the automated graph searching approach is associated with early graft dislocation [57]. On the postoperative period, the graft dislocation can also be objectively quantified using a convolutional neural network [58].…”
Section: Corneal Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%