2018
DOI: 10.18178/ijmlc.2018.8.1.664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Deep Learning for Melanoma Detection in Dermoscopy Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important issue is related to the artifacts observed in clinical or dermoscopic images, such as surgical skin markings, dark corners, gel bubbles, superimposed color charts, overlayed rulers, and occluding hair that can affect image classification by automated algorithms [ 55 ]. Various methods have been reported for the removal of such artifacts and strategies for preprocessing images were described to improve the classification outcomes of DNNs [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ]. Finally, a major point of weakness of our study was the lack of comparison with traditional, hand-designed image descriptors [ 50 , 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important issue is related to the artifacts observed in clinical or dermoscopic images, such as surgical skin markings, dark corners, gel bubbles, superimposed color charts, overlayed rulers, and occluding hair that can affect image classification by automated algorithms [ 55 ]. Various methods have been reported for the removal of such artifacts and strategies for preprocessing images were described to improve the classification outcomes of DNNs [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 ]. Finally, a major point of weakness of our study was the lack of comparison with traditional, hand-designed image descriptors [ 50 , 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important issue is related to the artifacts observed in clinical or dermoscopic images, such as surgical skin markings, dark corners, gel bubbles, superimposed color charts, overlayed rulers, and occluding hair that can affect image classification by automated algorithms [51]. Various methods have been reported for the removal of such artifacts and strategies for preprocessing of images were described to improve the classification outcomes of DNNs [51-54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The justification and challenging groups comprise 1,000 images, without ground truth. In our experimentations, we used 80% of the training traditional of the ISIC 2018 dataset for training and 20% for justification as planned in [21]. In try, ISBI 2017 databases were separated into workout, justification and challenging groups with 2000 images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%