2021
DOI: 10.3390/a14110318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Decision Trees and Random Forest Algorithms to Predict and Determine Factors Contributing to First-Year University Students’ Learning Performance

Abstract: First-year students’ learning performance has received much attention in educational practice and theory. Previous works used some variables, which should be obtained during the course or in the progress of the semester through questionnaire surveys and interviews, to build prediction models. These models cannot provide enough timely support for the poor performance students, caused by economic factors. Therefore, other variables are needed that allow us to reach prediction results earlier. This study attempts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Student ability to learn (SL), student knowledge (SK), video conference application (VC), students' perceptions, attitudes toward VC, intention to use VC, and actual use of VC were considered for analysis when attempting to identify and predict students' academic performance in VCAOL during Covid-19 [3][4][5]. Our nding lled the gap while several previous studies have investigated RF, SVM, and GNB for academic prediction in students, generating better results than ours, but they did not develop model-agnostic ML to evaluate classi cation models for comprehending predictive features [11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Student ability to learn (SL), student knowledge (SK), video conference application (VC), students' perceptions, attitudes toward VC, intention to use VC, and actual use of VC were considered for analysis when attempting to identify and predict students' academic performance in VCAOL during Covid-19 [3][4][5]. Our nding lled the gap while several previous studies have investigated RF, SVM, and GNB for academic prediction in students, generating better results than ours, but they did not develop model-agnostic ML to evaluate classi cation models for comprehending predictive features [11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Thao-Trang Huynh-Cam [13] RF, C5O, CART, and multilayer perceptron (MLP) algorithms. CART outperforms C5O, RF, and MLP algorithms with accuracy 80%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Ref. [20] used family background variables, and [21] used data from the interaction of the students to build predictive models of student learning performance. Moreover, Ref.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The members of the result set become more similar to one another with each division series. The members of the result set become more similar to one another with each division series [7][8][9]. The C4.5 method is a decision tree formation technique that calculates the gain value, with the highest gain serving as the first node or root node [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%