2017
DOI: 10.1002/fee.1481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using decision analysis to support proactive management of emerging infectious wildlife diseases

Abstract: Despite calls for improved responses to emerging infectious diseases in wildlife, management is seldom considered until a disease has been detected in affected populations. Reactive approaches may limit the potential for control and increase total response costs. An alternative, proactive management framework can identify immediate actions that reduce future impacts even before a disease is detected, and plan subsequent actions that are conditional on disease emergence. We identify four main obstacles to devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
93
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our initial comparison of actions was obviously not exhaustive and more creative thinking is to be encouraged (Grant et al., ). However, irrespective of the management strategy, our conclusions are likely to remain broadly applicable; ultimately any action that seeks to address an epidemic would rely on the manipulation of one of the processes described in the model, such as pathogen growth, host survival or rates of transition between infection states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our initial comparison of actions was obviously not exhaustive and more creative thinking is to be encouraged (Grant et al., ). However, irrespective of the management strategy, our conclusions are likely to remain broadly applicable; ultimately any action that seeks to address an epidemic would rely on the manipulation of one of the processes described in the model, such as pathogen growth, host survival or rates of transition between infection states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particularly challenging problem for conservation science is the development of responses to emerging infectious diseases, which are increasingly driving biodiversity loss worldwide (Fisher et al., ). Infectious diseases often demand rapid decision‐making in the face of scarce knowledge, limited time for learning, and challenges turning the available scientific knowledge into actions (Grant et al., ). For example, the amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis was identified about 20 years ago (Longcore, Pessier, & Nichols, ); its role in global amphibian declines was clarified over the following decade (Skerratt et al., ); potential mitigation strategies were then considered (Scheele et al., ; Woodhams et al., ), yet to date implementation has been rare and success in maintaining susceptible populations of amphibians in the pathogen's presence remains elusive (Bosch et al., ; Geiger, Bregnard, Maluenda, Voordouw, & Schmidt, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, appropriate opportunities for proactive management of wildlife diseases (i.e., those that do not affect humans, livestock, or crops) are rarely identified (Voyles et al, 2015), although they may be more effective and cost less than reactive approaches (Sterrett et al, 2019). By considering actions prior to the arrival of a pathogen, managers will be primed to acknowledge constraints, identify uncertainties in the host's ecology, and develop strategic collaborations that secure resources for improving host populations and mitigating the disease risk (Grant et al, 2017;Meek et al, 2015). By considering actions prior to the arrival of a pathogen, managers will be primed to acknowledge constraints, identify uncertainties in the host's ecology, and develop strategic collaborations that secure resources for improving host populations and mitigating the disease risk (Grant et al, 2017;Meek et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mate change mitigation and adaptation plans developed for human communities, few management strategies have been developed specifically for imperiled species, and ones targeting amphibians are especially rare (Appendix S1A). Consequently,Grant et al (2017) issued a call for improved responses to the potential threat of emerging infectious diseases, a significant factor in the declines and extinctions of amphibian species.AsGrant et al (2017) stressed with the threat of emerging infectious diseases, effective conservation and management in the face of climatic uncertainty require a proactive framework to reduce risk of future catastrophic storm impacts to vulnerable populations of imperiled species. The few climate adaptation actions that have been explored for amphibians primarily focus on mediating effects of temperature increases and more variable precipitation (Griffis-Kyle, 2016;Shoo et al, 2011) Muths and Fisher (2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%