2018 IEEE International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/sege.2018.8499513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using DDS Based on Unified Data Model to Improve Interoperability of Smart Grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because SG consists of multiple power domains (i.e., operation, generation, distribution, and customer) each of which uses its own connectivity protocols [21]. Additionally, the diversity of data models and standards creates further data interoperability challenges in SG [22]. All these challenges result in deteriorating the connectivity of different power domains in SG.…”
Section: B Iot Context Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because SG consists of multiple power domains (i.e., operation, generation, distribution, and customer) each of which uses its own connectivity protocols [21]. Additionally, the diversity of data models and standards creates further data interoperability challenges in SG [22]. All these challenges result in deteriorating the connectivity of different power domains in SG.…”
Section: B Iot Context Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AsyncAPI descriptions are expected to be both human and machine readable. To achieve this goal, files defining a message-driven API are represented as JSON objects and conform to the JSON standards 2 . Such files allow describing, among other things, the message brokers of an architecture, the topics of interest, or the different formats of the messages associated with each of the topics.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond AsyncAPI, asynchronous communication can also be defined with Data Distribution Service (DDS) [37], which is a data-centric publish/subscribe (DCPS) model for distributed application communication. While both DDS and AsyncAPI provide a specific language for data definition-the so-called Interface Definition Language (IDL) [39] in the case of the former, and JSON Schema in the case of the latter-they differ in different aspects: (i) DDS is oriented to the data itself and not the messages [2]; (ii) DDS is technology agnostic, and as a consequence, does not consider architectural elements such as the different protocols, servers and listening ports-to name a few-involved; and (iii) DDS has a more mature ecosystem. However, although DDS is technology agnostic, its implementations are more niche-focused 26 : most of the solutions focus on supporting C and C++ and support to other languages are provided via bridges to execute native code in compiled libraries.…”
Section: Model-based Approaches For Message-driven Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alaerjan et al [84] designed a unified model between the two standards using mapping and extension methods. Based on the model, the authors demonstrated an architecture for data exchange using a network communication middleware called data distribution service (DDS).…”
Section: Mapping and Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%