2023
DOI: 10.3390/children10091470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Data Tools and Systems to Drive Change in Early Childhood Education for Disadvantaged Children in South Africa

Sonja Giese,
Andrew Dawes,
Linda Biersteker
et al.

Abstract: In line with United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4.2, South Africa’s National Development Plan commits to providing high-quality early childhood education to all children by 2030 to drive improved child outcomes. Prior to 2016, South Africa lacked reliable, locally standardised, valid, and cross-culturally fair assessment tools for measuring preschool quality and child outcomes, suitable for use at scale within a resource-constrained context. In this paper we detail the development and evolution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some SSA countries have attempted implementing a universal fee-free primary education system to guarantee education for all children; however, positive and negative results have been found. The fee-charging option offers the public system an additional source of income and social impact regarding parents' ownership in their children's education [24][25][26][27]; however, such fees can also be barriers for those who cannot afford them [27]. Although efforts to enhance free education have positively impacted enrollment and school completion, their repercussions on personnel and infrastructure have been detrimental [21].…”
Section: Funding Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some SSA countries have attempted implementing a universal fee-free primary education system to guarantee education for all children; however, positive and negative results have been found. The fee-charging option offers the public system an additional source of income and social impact regarding parents' ownership in their children's education [24][25][26][27]; however, such fees can also be barriers for those who cannot afford them [27]. Although efforts to enhance free education have positively impacted enrollment and school completion, their repercussions on personnel and infrastructure have been detrimental [21].…”
Section: Funding Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%