Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 2 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Data from Multiple SAR Sensors in Landslide Characterization: Case Studies from Different Geomorphological Contexts in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By adopting a γ threshold of 0.7, implementation of the Coherent Pixels Technique [9] led to an average target density of ~500 points/km 2 for the same area of interest [10]. With the ISBAS algorithm only those pixels showing coherence higher than 0.5 were employed for the unwrapping step, provided that the number of coherent interferograms for those pixels exceeded 50.…”
Section: Isbas Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By adopting a γ threshold of 0.7, implementation of the Coherent Pixels Technique [9] led to an average target density of ~500 points/km 2 for the same area of interest [10]. With the ISBAS algorithm only those pixels showing coherence higher than 0.5 were employed for the unwrapping step, provided that the number of coherent interferograms for those pixels exceeded 50.…”
Section: Isbas Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently from optical images, SAR sensors have the advantage to be able to gather ground surface information regardless of weather and illumination conditions. Geoscientists have widely exploited Interferometric SAR (InSAR, Gabriel et al 1989) techniques to resolve the spatial distribution and temporal evolution of ground instabilities by considering phase values associated with SAR scenes (Novellino et al 2015;Confuorto et al 2017;Raspini et al 2017;Spinetti et al 2019). Due, to the inherent limitations of current space observation systems and data processing techniques (Colesanti and Wasowski 2006;Wasowski and Bovenga 2014), InSAR approaches are mostly applicable to extremely slow (<16mm/yr) and very-slow movements (≥1.6mm/yr and ≤16mm/yr) landslides (Cruden and Varnes 1996) which typically correspond to deep-seated gravitational slope deformations, creep, and, in some cases, slides and complex landslides (Saroli et al 2005;Di Martire et al 2016;Bozzano et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently from optical images, SAR data gather ground surface information regardless of weather and illumination conditions. Geoscientists have widely exploited Interferometric SAR (InSAR (Gabriel et al 1989) techniques to resolve the spatial distribution and temporal evolution of ground instabilities by considering the phase values associated to SAR scenes (Novellino et al 2015;Confuorto et al 2017;Raspini et al 2017;Spinetti et al 2019). However, due to the inherent limitations of current space observation systems and data processing techniques (Colesanti and Wasowski 2006;Wasowski and Bovenga 2014), InSAR approaches are currently applicable only to extremely slow (<16mm/yr) and very-slow movements (≥1.6mm/yr and ≤16mm/yr) landslides (Cruden and Varnes 1996) which typically correspond to deep-seated gravitational slope deformations, creep, and, in some cases, slides and complex landslides (Saroli et al 2005;Di Martire et al 2016;Bozzano et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%