2008
DOI: 10.1177/1080569908325859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Critical Praxis to Understand and Teach Teamwork

Abstract: The authors pursue three aims in this article. The first is to underscore critical praxis as an especially valuable approach to understanding and enabling teamwork. The second is to offer four dimensions of teamwork—vision, roles, processes, and relationships— as salient areas to interrogate using critical praxis. The third aim is to consider the implications and methods for teaching teamwork in the classroom context. In the process of doing so, the authors highlight limitations of prevailing theoretical appro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent literature forecasts the success of teamwork when grounded in: critical pedagogy (Ding and Ding, 2008;Keyton and Beck, 2008;Kolb et al, 2008;Seibold and Kang, 2008), practices of team development (Bushe and Coetzer, 2007;Frederick, 2008;Kriflik and Mullan, 2007;Staggers et al, 2008;Scott-Ladd and Chan, 2008;Tuckman, 1965) and preliminary explicit generic skills teaching (Kriflik and Mullan, 2007). However, Scott-Ladd and Chan (2008, p. 234) maintain that there is still a gap in research in the area of "giving students practical skills for building team cohesion and managing team processes".…”
Section: Valid Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature forecasts the success of teamwork when grounded in: critical pedagogy (Ding and Ding, 2008;Keyton and Beck, 2008;Kolb et al, 2008;Seibold and Kang, 2008), practices of team development (Bushe and Coetzer, 2007;Frederick, 2008;Kriflik and Mullan, 2007;Staggers et al, 2008;Scott-Ladd and Chan, 2008;Tuckman, 1965) and preliminary explicit generic skills teaching (Kriflik and Mullan, 2007). However, Scott-Ladd and Chan (2008, p. 234) maintain that there is still a gap in research in the area of "giving students practical skills for building team cohesion and managing team processes".…”
Section: Valid Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rarely do business teams get to choose their teammates. Lastly, these fundamentals resolve the critical praxis suggested by Seibold and Kang (2008), "teaching a process involving a continuous relationship between practice and reflexivity".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Students report that they enjoyed working as a team (often for the first time ever). With true teamwork often fostering stronger interpersonal relationships (Seibold & Kang, 2008), they also often expect to remain in contact with their group members beyond the class.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%