2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-014-1160-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Coupled Mesoscale Experiments and Simulations to Investigate High Burn-Up Oxide Fuel Thermal Conductivity

Abstract: Nuclear energy is a mature technology with a small carbon footprint. However, work is needed to make current reactor technology more accident tolerant and to allow reactor fuel to be burned in a reactor for longer periods of time. Optimizing the reactor fuel performance is essentially a materials science problem. The current understanding of fuel microstructure have been limited by the difficulty in studying the structure and chemistry of irradiated fuel samples at the mesoscale. Here, we take advantage of rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in the current work, the simulations of gas bubble evolution were performed in a two-dimensional, 256dx × 256dx simulation cell. The model can be implemented in Idaho National Laboratory's MARMOT and BISON fuel performance code [77,78], which has efficient scalable numerical methods, for large scale gas bubble microstructure evolution simulations in 3D and polycrystalline materials.…”
Section: Parameters Of Phase-field Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the current work, the simulations of gas bubble evolution were performed in a two-dimensional, 256dx × 256dx simulation cell. The model can be implemented in Idaho National Laboratory's MARMOT and BISON fuel performance code [77,78], which has efficient scalable numerical methods, for large scale gas bubble microstructure evolution simulations in 3D and polycrystalline materials.…”
Section: Parameters Of Phase-field Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal conductivity of nuclear fuel heterogeneous microstructures has been modeled previously using analytical, empirical [10,16,17,18], and phase field modeling [15] methods. In prior empirical modeling work, only select microstructural features (identified by researchers) were used to predict fuel thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Related Work 1thermal Conductivity Modeling Of Nuclear Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to empirical modeling, computational modeling approaches have been used to predict thermal conductivity of nuclear fuel independent of experimental data. Such methods include COMSOL multiphysics simulations, finite element methods, and phase field modeling [15,16,17,18]. Reference [15] reports a method of estimating thermal conductivity of a polycrystalline metal with inter-and intra-granular gas bubbles using the phase field method.…”
Section: Related Work 1thermal Conductivity Modeling Of Nuclear Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A finite element method (FEM) was used to calculate the effective change in grain boundary kapitza resistance due to the presence of elliptic intergranular gas bubbles in a bi-crystal UO 2 nuclear fuels [14]. Very recently, Teague et al [15] used FEM to assess the effect of defects including porosity, precipitates, and fission product layer on thermal conductivity in irradiated mixed oxide (MOX) fuels by directly using the three-dimensional microstructures from advanced 3D microstructure reconstruction techniques. However, the microstructures in irradiated nuclear fuels are very complicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But all these simulations were carried out in two dimensions. In very recent work, Teague et al [15] claimed that a phase-field model is used to relax the three dimensional microstructure before they calculated the thermal conductivity. This work will present a numerical method to assess the effect of three dimensional polycrystalline microstructure and gas bubble microstructures on thermal conductivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%