Using copied software: your work product at risk

Krüger, Rolf

doi:10.1109/wescon.1994.403606

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They bring out the importance of sanctions and punishments and the fears relating to them to minimize unauthorized copying of software: Limayem et al . (1999, p. 129), Mackenzie & Goldman (2000, p. 175), Johnson (1988), Solomon & O'Brien (1991), Straub & Nance (1990, p. 46), Strikwerda & Ross (1992, p. 135), Moores & Dhillon (2000, p. 90), Vitell & Davis (1990, p. 70), Kruger (1994) and Thong & Yap (1998).…”

Section: Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment Orientationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unauthorized copying of software and levels of moral development: a literature analysis and its implications for research and practice

Siponen

Vartiainen

2004

Information Systems Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several approaches for and against the unauthorized copying of software have been proposed. These approaches can be divided into two categories: moral reasoning and solution. These categories of approaches to unauthorized copying of software are scrutinized in the light of Kohlberg's theory of Cognitive Moral Development. The results suggest that most approaches presenting solutions to unauthorized copying of software have focused attention on the lower levels of moral development, while approaches at the highest stage are few and far between. No single approach covers all the stages of moral development. The implications of this analysis for practice and research are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment Orientationmentioning

confidence: 99%