2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using continuous sampling to examine the distribution of traffic related air pollution in proximity to a major road

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, the joint effect of spatial location, meteorological factors, local traffic variables, and other uncertain sources plays a crucial role in street-scale variations of PM 2.5 and CO concentrations, which is in accordance with previous studies on roadside air pollutants (McAdam et al, 2011;Jian et al, 2012). Moreover, different variables are found having different effects on both PM 2.5 and CO concentrations, and the impact of the same variable varies dramatically among time periods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, the joint effect of spatial location, meteorological factors, local traffic variables, and other uncertain sources plays a crucial role in street-scale variations of PM 2.5 and CO concentrations, which is in accordance with previous studies on roadside air pollutants (McAdam et al, 2011;Jian et al, 2012). Moreover, different variables are found having different effects on both PM 2.5 and CO concentrations, and the impact of the same variable varies dramatically among time periods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Beckerman et al (2008) depicted a varying decay degree of PM 2.5 (20%-60%) at 500 m from two expressways. McAdam et al (2011) found that hourly PM 2.5 was 39% higher at 10 m from curb side than that of 30 m from curb side, but there was no significant difference in CO levels with increasing distance from the road. Our research is generally consistent with near-road studies that PM 2.5 levels in neighborhoods are lower than at the roadside.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Heavy-duty vehicles are known to produce significantly higher nitrogen dioxide and particulate matters than carbon monoxide and contribute one-third of nitrogen oxides on highways [42]. The increased number of diesel vehicles over the last decades and use of oxidizing catalytic converters in diesel vehicles has also been identified to result in an increased ratio of NO 2 /NO x from road traffic emissions [19] [43]. Cheng et al [5] also reported similar trends, where high level of pollutant NO 2 was observed on urban roads where high density of heavy-duty vehicles passes through.…”
Section: T Ekeu-wei Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meteorological factors such as wind, precipitation, humidity and temperature, influence the dispersion, deposition, transportation and transformation of nitrogen dioxide. Wind direction defines the direction of pollutant spatial distribution, while wind speed dictates the dispersion and deposition rate [19] [20]. High wind speed tends to reduce NO 2 concentration by aiding pollutant transportation and dispersion and vice versa in the direction of up-wind [21] [22].…”
Section: Factors That Influence No2 Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,[17][18][19][20] Many personal exposure studies, however, have been limited to a single microenvironment, due to limitations in monitoring technology. 21 Single-microenvironment studies have evaluated air pollutant concentrations at home, [22][23][24] at office buildings, 25,26 near roadways, 27,28 or in transit. [29][30][31] Recent technological advances have enabled a more holistic view of individual exposures as they occur across microenvironments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%