2011
DOI: 10.4169/college.math.j.42.3.229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Continuity Induction

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Mathematical Association of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The College Mathematics Journal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our conclusion about classical approaches is that several classical proofs are quite difficult and subtle for the beginner (e.g., proofs of EVT or Heine using BW). Recent attempts to improve this situation in the literature advocate the use of Cousin [12] or Ind [5,17], but this can also be cumbersome at times (although we agree that this is a matter of opinion).…”
Section: Ivtmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our conclusion about classical approaches is that several classical proofs are quite difficult and subtle for the beginner (e.g., proofs of EVT or Heine using BW). Recent attempts to improve this situation in the literature advocate the use of Cousin [12] or Ind [5,17], but this can also be cumbersome at times (although we agree that this is a matter of opinion).…”
Section: Ivtmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[8, pp.1-2] Felix Klein coined the phrase "the arithmetizing of mathematics" [22], a classic of the era of rigor. Until today, the foundation has not been put into question; it is still recognized as satisfactory in all classical textbooks which define R as any ordered field satisfying one of the equivalent completeness axioms listed below 1 : Sup (Least Upper Bound Property) Any set of real numbers has a supremum (and an infimum) 2 ; Cut (Dedekind's Completeness) Any cut defines a (unique) real number; Nest+Arch (Cantor's Property) Any sequence of nested closed intervals has a common point + Archimedean property; Cauchy+Arch (Cauchy's Completeness) Any Cauchy sequence converges + Archimedean property; Mono (Monotone Convergence) Any monotonic sequence has a limit 2 ; BW (Bolzano-Weierstrass) Any infinite set of real numbers (or any sequence) has a limit point 2 ; BL (Borel-Lebesgue) Any cover of a closed interval by open intervals has a finite subcover 3 ; Cousin (Cousin's partition [12]) Any gauge defined on a closed interval admits a fine tagged partition of this interval; Ind (Continuous Induction [5,17,20]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 2 is due to D. Hathaway [Ha11] and, independently, to me. But mathematically equivalent ideas have been around in the literature for a long time, some of which are much closer to our formulation than the one of Chao given above.…”
Section: Real Inductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…But this is just the first -if it actually is the first -of many similar formulations of "continuous induction". A literature search turned up the following papers, each of which introduces some form of "continuous induction", in many cases with no reference to past precedent: [Kh23], [Pe26], [Kh49], [Du57], [Fo57], [MR68], [Sh72], [Be82], [Le82], [Sa84], [Do03], [Ka07], [Ha11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 7 (Continuity induction Hathaway [2011]). A predicate P (t) holds for all t ∈ [0, T ], where T > 0, if and only if:…”
Section: Positive Invariance Via Real Inductionmentioning
confidence: 99%