2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-012-1115-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using contextual spaces for image re-ranking and rank aggregation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential of this framework is that each module can be improved separately, leading to better results. For example, our text module can use more sophisticated text processing/analysis, or the fusion module can apply more elaborated approaches (e.g., [5,15,16]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The potential of this framework is that each module can be improved separately, leading to better results. For example, our text module can use more sophisticated text processing/analysis, or the fusion module can apply more elaborated approaches (e.g., [5,15,16]). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Score-based rank aggregation approaches has been used in the multimodal image retrieval context [16] and also used for associating photos to georeferenced textual documents [2]. In this paper, we aim at using a score-based rank aggregation approach for combining features of di↵erent modalities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), and the need to annotate the existing images with the keywords that can apply to them. Among the proposals based on visual examples, which are content-based image retrieval techniques (based on the analysis of different types of visual or textual features [20,21,22]), we can distinguish several approaches:…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dessa forma, se o conjunto inicial de resultados apresenta imagens relevantes, a tendênciaé que o usuário possa fornecer informação de qualidade para o sistema e, assim, os resultados ao longo das iterações subsequentes sejam mais satisfatórios [Calumby et al 2017]. Por outro lado, abordagens tradicionais de recuperação de imagens produzem resultados baseados no cômputo de similaridade apenas entre pares de imagens, deixando de explorar a informação existente nas relações entre elas [Pedronette et al 2014]. Alternativamente,é possível combinar técnicas de re-ranqueamento com a realimentação de relevância, a fim de propagar as melhorias na eficácia dos rankings iniciais ao longo das iterações de feedback.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified