2016
DOI: 10.1109/jbhi.2015.2414934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Contextual Learning to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy: Application in Breast Cancer Screening

Abstract: Clinicians need to routinely make management decisions about patients who are at risk for a disease such as breast cancer. This paper presents a novel clinical decision support tool that is capable of helping physicians make diagnostic decisions. We apply this support system to improve the specificity of breast cancer screening and diagnosis. The system utilizes clinical context (e.g., demographics, medical history) to minimize the false positive rates while avoiding false negatives. An online contextual learn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 The recommendation is considered to be accurate when the user clicks to the item, and is considered to be novel when the user rates the item as novel. 4 Thus, r 1 t = 1 if the user clicks to the item and 0 otherwise. Similarly, r 2 t = 1 if the user rates the item as novel and 0 otherwise.…”
Section: Applications Of Cmab-domentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 The recommendation is considered to be accurate when the user clicks to the item, and is considered to be novel when the user rates the item as novel. 4 Thus, r 1 t = 1 if the user clicks to the item and 0 otherwise. Similarly, r 2 t = 1 if the user rates the item as novel and 0 otherwise.…”
Section: Applications Of Cmab-domentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalizing MOC-MAB to achieve sublinear regret for all objectives will require construction of a hierarchy of candidate optimal arm sets similar to the one given in (4). We leave this interesting research problem as future work, and explain when lexicographically optimality in the first two objectives indicates lexicographic optimality in d r objectives and why the number of cases in which lexicographically optimality in the first two objectives does not indicate lexicographic optimality in d r objectives is scarce.…”
Section: B Lexicographic Optimality For D R > 2 Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main goal of diagnosis is to minimize the FPR, given a tolerable threshold for the FNR selected by the system user. In the simulations, the threshold for FNR is set to be 3%, which is considered to be a reasonable level in breast cancer diagnosis [26]. Using this threshold, we can re-characterize the performance metric as follows.…”
Section: A Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid increase in the generation speed of the streaming data, online learning methods are becoming increasingly valuable for sequential decision making problems. Many of these problems, ranging from recommender systems [1] to medical screening and diagnosis [2,3] to cognitive radio networks [4] involve multiple and possibly conflicting objectives. In this work, we propose a multi-objective contextual bandit problem with dominant and non-dominant objectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%