2016 International Conference on Advanced Informatics: Concepts, Theory and Application (ICAICTA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icaicta.2016.7803098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using conservative estimation for conditional probability instead of ignoring infrequent case

Abstract: Abstract-There are several estimators of conditional probability from observed frequencies of features. In this paper, we propose using the lower limit of confidence interval on posterior distribution determined by the observed frequencies to ascertain conditional probability. In our experiments, this method outperformed other popular estimators.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kikuchi et al [9] propose to use the confidence interval by assuming that the prior distribution is a uniform distribution. They also contain one parameter to tune, which is the confidence level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kikuchi et al [9] propose to use the confidence interval by assuming that the prior distribution is a uniform distribution. They also contain one parameter to tune, which is the confidence level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each rank of the output, we compute the recall rate by a given value of rank. This metrics is also reference [9].…”
Section: Experimental Setting and Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is important to measure interestingness appropriately for successful mining. In this section, we first introduce existing measures [1,4,6] and describe the problems of using them in our mining. Subsequently, we propose the measure WCC to mitigate the problems.…”
Section: Interestingness Measures For Association Rulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the proposed measure treats the two types of evidence with different weights. Moreover, our measure uses conservative confidence [4], which underestimates the interestingness of a rule if it has a low frequency. This allows dealing with low-frequency rules, which are ignored in general mining problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%