2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using conditional tree forests and life history traits to assess specific risks of stream degradation under multiple pressure scenario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
38
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
7
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, in 1724 sampling sites distributed across France, risk classes for phosphate and nitrate as well as for nitrogen and habitat degradation exhibited the strongest correlations among the 16 stressors that were assessed (Mondy & Usseglio‐Polatera, ). In contrast to our study, correlations between organic toxicants and nutrients or habitat degradation were very weak (Mondy & Usseglio‐Polatera, ), possibly because concentrations instead of toxicity estimates (e.g. TU) were used in that study to assess risk and risk categories instead of raw data were used in the correlation analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, in 1724 sampling sites distributed across France, risk classes for phosphate and nitrate as well as for nitrogen and habitat degradation exhibited the strongest correlations among the 16 stressors that were assessed (Mondy & Usseglio‐Polatera, ). In contrast to our study, correlations between organic toxicants and nutrients or habitat degradation were very weak (Mondy & Usseglio‐Polatera, ), possibly because concentrations instead of toxicity estimates (e.g. TU) were used in that study to assess risk and risk categories instead of raw data were used in the correlation analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to highlight environmental changes, anthropogenic disturbances and trophic interactions, an approach based on trait assemblages at the community scale is more efficient than traditional taxonomic methods (Hughes ). A trait‐based approach can provide an integrative signal of environmental impairment (Mondy and Usseglio‐Polatera ), and allows reducing variation across ecoregions (Pont et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to highlight environmental changes, anthropogenic disturbances and trophic interactions, an approach based on trait assemblages at the community scale is more efficient than traditional taxonomic methods (Hughes 2000). A trait-based approach can provide an integrative signal of environmental impairment (Mondy and Usseglio-Polatera 2013), and allows reducing variation across ecoregions (Pont et al 2006). Furthermore, prey-predator interactions should be easily highlighted by trait assemblage approaches because predation selection depends more on morphological or behavioral characteristics than on species identity (Green and Côt e 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a trait-based approach allowed for the derivation of thresholds for pesticides in freshwater ecosystems based on data from different regional studies (Sch€ afer et al, 2012). In addition, ecosystems are subject to multiple stressors concurrently, and traits may help to disentangle effects from different stressors and to study interactions between stressors (Statzner and Bêche, 2010;Moe et al, 2013;Mondy and Usseglio-Polatera, 2013). Moreover, the term pollution comprises different chemicals such as nutrients, inorganic and organic toxicants, which differ in their modes of actions and may consequently differ in their trait responses (Rubach et al, 2010;Swain et al, 2010).…”
Section: Use Of Traits In Studies On Climate Change and Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 99%