2017
DOI: 10.1177/1541931213601889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Conditional Probabilities to Understand “Human Error” in Military Aviation Mishaps

Abstract: The Department of Defense Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (DoD HFACS) is the standardized taxonomy used by the services to classify human error identified in mishaps and hazards. DoD HFACS encourages safety investigators and professionals to examine how higher-level influences (e.g. organizational policy, supervisor ability, and technological environment) can impact perfor mance for the individuals executing the actual work (e.g. aviators flying the aircraft). The current project applied the w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In identifying risk factors for various errors and violations, we were able to confirm certain results of Miranda (2017) at a higher level of abstraction: A misinterpreted instrument is the strongest risk factor for a performance-based error. When evaluating the related reports, it became clear that misread instruments may also occur in connection with so-called mixed-fleet-flying (pilots have the license for aircraft types that differ only slightly from each other).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In identifying risk factors for various errors and violations, we were able to confirm certain results of Miranda (2017) at a higher level of abstraction: A misinterpreted instrument is the strongest risk factor for a performance-based error. When evaluating the related reports, it became clear that misread instruments may also occur in connection with so-called mixed-fleet-flying (pilots have the license for aircraft types that differ only slightly from each other).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…We could expand the state of research, indicating that lack of assertiveness is not only a risk factor for judgment and decision-making errors, but also for violations (cf. Miranda, 2017). This result is not surprising, considering that decisions in commercial cockpits are mainly made jointly by the pilots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), which is based on the Swiss Cheese Model, considers the occurrence of incidents as a linear failure in the areas of organizational influences, unsafe supervision, preconditions, and pilots' unsafe acts [58]. The appropriateness of HFACS for incident report analysis has also been demonstrated in scientific studies [59,60]. In HFACS, pilots' unsafe acts are divided into performance-based errors, judgment and decision-making errors, and violations.…”
Section: Reflecting Incidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%