2017
DOI: 10.4236/jmf.2017.74045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Conditional Extreme Value Theory to Estimate Value-at-Risk for Daily Currency Exchange Rates

Abstract: This paper implements different approaches used to compute the one-day Value-at-Risk (VaR) forecast for a portfolio of four currency exchange rates. The concepts and techniques of the conventional methods considered in the study are first reviewed. These approaches have shortcomings and therefore fail to capture the stylized characteristics of financial time series returns such as; non-normality, the phenomenon of volatility clustering and the fat tails exhibited by the return distribution. The GARCH models an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this day, many researchers have investigated the estimation of VaR and CVaR, with the help of Extreme Value Theory (Bee and Trapin 2018). A look at past studies in finance literature shows that, as opposed to other models, Value at Risk can be calculated much more accurately, using the EVT (Gencay and Selcuk 2004;Omari et al 2017). However, VaR is not only incoherent but also fails to precisely estimate the risk of loss when the loss distributions show "fat tails" (Rockafellar and Uryasev 2002), and this significantly hurts the accuracy of this risk measure (Chen 2018).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this day, many researchers have investigated the estimation of VaR and CVaR, with the help of Extreme Value Theory (Bee and Trapin 2018). A look at past studies in finance literature shows that, as opposed to other models, Value at Risk can be calculated much more accurately, using the EVT (Gencay and Selcuk 2004;Omari et al 2017). However, VaR is not only incoherent but also fails to precisely estimate the risk of loss when the loss distributions show "fat tails" (Rockafellar and Uryasev 2002), and this significantly hurts the accuracy of this risk measure (Chen 2018).…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An often used procedure is the analysis of a mean residual life plot which represents the mean of the excesses of the threshold u. This method is used by Aboura (2014), Omari, Mwita and Waititu (2017) to estimate VaR based on GARCH-EVT approach. Another very popular procedure to threshold selection is graphical representation of Hill (Hill, 1975), Pickands (Pickands, 1975) or Dekkers-Einmahl-de Haan estimators (Dekkers, Einmahl and Haan, 1989).…”
Section: Tail Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A frequently used procedure relies on the analysis of a mean excess plot, which represents the mean of the excesses of the threshold u. This method was applied in Aboura (2014), Cifter (2011), Gilli and Këllezi (2006), Łuczak and Just (2020) and Omari et al (2017). The change in the pattern for a very high threshold is observed in this plot; therefore, the choice of a threshold is ambiguous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%