2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using conceptual models as a planning and evaluation tool in conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
104
0
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
104
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…We constructed a conceptual model to diagram proximate and ultimate causes of maned wolf endangerment (Figure 7.8; Margoluis et al, 2009), based on the conservation issues known to affect MW and their habitat (Deem and Emmons, 2005;Dietz, 1984;Klink and Machado, 2005;Paula et al, 2008;Rodden et al, 2008).…”
Section: Threats To Maned Wolf Habitat Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We constructed a conceptual model to diagram proximate and ultimate causes of maned wolf endangerment (Figure 7.8; Margoluis et al, 2009), based on the conservation issues known to affect MW and their habitat (Deem and Emmons, 2005;Dietz, 1984;Klink and Machado, 2005;Paula et al, 2008;Rodden et al, 2008).…”
Section: Threats To Maned Wolf Habitat Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various threats to environment or habitat have been widely reported in conservation science (Margoluis et al 2009;Salafsky et al 2002;Salafsky et al 2008). Human-induced increases in the magnitude or frequency of catastrophic events, however, can be considered threat (Salafsky and Margoluis 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a large number of scientific works have been published on this subject, with conceptual modelling applications for validating variables, identifying criteria, and preparing status indicators and work on WebGIS platforms [65][66][67][68][69][70]; and also for developing spatial indicators, value functions and spatial support systems in various environments [71][72][73][74][75].…”
Section: Spatial Decision Support Systems For Planning and Integratedmentioning
confidence: 99%