2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60103-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Computer-Based Assessments to Evaluate Interactive Multimedia Nutrition Education Among Low-Income Predominantly Hispanic Participants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For one study (Jantz et al 2002) the effect size of one outcome exceeded the outlier threshold; this outcome was hence removed from the analyses. All other studies and outcomes were retained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one study (Jantz et al 2002) the effect size of one outcome exceeded the outlier threshold; this outcome was hence removed from the analyses. All other studies and outcomes were retained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only can multimedia products strengthen factual knowledge and mastery of concepts, Ellis (2001) found that educational products that were enhanced with multimedia proved effective in promoting critical thinking in adult students. Multimedia education tools have been used to teach urology to undergraduate medical students (Teichman, 1999), improve health outcomes of children with asthma (Krishna et al, 2003), improve nutrition education in at-risk populations (Carroll et al, 1996;Jantz, Anderson, & Gould, 2002), teach the basics of ABA to parent of children diagnosed with ASD (PEAT, 2010), and allow cancer patients to make informed treatment choices (Diefenbach & Butz, 2004). Over the past seventeen years, Keenan (1993;1997;2003; has designed and produced numerous multimedia packages to facilitate the learning of behavioural concepts, principles, and procedures directed at promoting critical thinking skills (Keenan & Dillenburger, 2000a;2001;Keenan et al, 2003;PEAT, 2007;.…”
Section: Multimedia Technology In Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due in part to the increased use and accessibility of computers in multiple settings (eg, homes, libraries, churches, recreational community centers, grocery stores, and schools) [7,9], the use of Web and computer-based assessments in large research trials have increased over the past 10 years [4,6,10]. The National Institutes of Health has recognized the need for novel/innovative assessment methods using technological advances in physical activity and dietary assessment (eg, PAR-12-198).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no consensus to whether a paper-based assessment is superior to a computerized one [11]; however, computer-based tools can provide an alternative means to collect and analyze data [12] and may be appealing to practitioners and researchers because of their proposed benefits. Computer-administered assessments may overcome difficulties sometimes associated with paper-based surveys as they allow for interactivity-two-way communication between computer and participant through photographs, videos, and displayed text with or without audio [7]. Other advantages of computerized questionnaire administration include-complete responses (ie, prompting individuals to answer all questions), written and narrated text, visual cues of portion sizes, immediate and rapid data entry and scoring, decreased scoring errors, increased attentiveness from participants, instantaneous feedback, and a greater ability to access understudied populations [6,8,10,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%