2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using computer-assisted survey instruments instead of paper and pencil increased completeness of self-administered sexual behavior questionnaires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regular screening of young people for a range of health and lifestyle issues is recommended by peak professional bodies [ 20 , 21 ] and, along with subsequent intervention, may improve health outcomes [ 22 ]. It is known that screening via technology increases disclosure when compared with paper [ 23 , 24 ] and face-to-face [ 25 , 26 ] formats. Furthermore, young people prefer initially disclosing health information via technology rather than face-to-face, even when they know the results will be reviewed by their practitioner [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regular screening of young people for a range of health and lifestyle issues is recommended by peak professional bodies [ 20 , 21 ] and, along with subsequent intervention, may improve health outcomes [ 22 ]. It is known that screening via technology increases disclosure when compared with paper [ 23 , 24 ] and face-to-face [ 25 , 26 ] formats. Furthermore, young people prefer initially disclosing health information via technology rather than face-to-face, even when they know the results will be reviewed by their practitioner [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, adolescents have been shown to prefer the electronic format, 26,27 particularly for sensitive topics such as sexual health. 28,29 Although at 53% uptake of services was not universal in this sample, it would not be reasonable to expect 100% because patient experiences and readiness differ. Still, the sexual health module led to a larger uptake of services than the percentage who reported a desire for more sexual health resources (37% of adolescent girls) in Guss et al's 14 study and certainly more than expected without any vehicle to promote sexual health questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A second possibility was to register it as ‘personal notes’. The third option reported by some interviewees, was to give the code ‘at risk of STI’ (International Classification of Primary Care code: ‘Fear of HIV’) (Wonca International Classification Committee, 2012). According to the participants, none of these possibilities sufficiently captured the (sensitive) sexual health information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are no accurate and detailed classification systems to store sensitive contextual information in a coded form in the GPs’ EMR. The International Classification of Primary Care, second edition only provides the following codes; P09: sexual preference concern, P29: psychological symptoms/complaints, Y08: sexual function symptoms/complaints and Y24: fear of sexual dysfunction (Wonca International Classification Committee, 2012). These codes offer non-specific information and, according to our participants, do not cover the yielded information after a discussion about specific sexual risks with a patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%