2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b03647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using Complementary NMR Data Sets To Detect Inconsistencies and Model Flaws in the Structure Determination of Human Interleukin-4

Abstract: The derivation of protein structure from values of observable quantities measured in NMR experiments is a rather nontrivial task due to (i) the limited number of data compared to degrees of freedom of a protein, (ii) the uncertainty inherent to the function connecting an observable quantity to molecular structure, (iii) the finite quality of biomolecular models and force fields used in structure refinement, and (iv) the conformational freedom of a protein in aqueous solution, which requires extensive conformat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 J‐coupling can be related to a torsional angle through the Karplus relation. At particular angles, variations in the Karplus relation parameters (a, b, c) lead to differences of up to 3 Hz even though the experimental uncertainties are generally lower than 0.1 Hz …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 J‐coupling can be related to a torsional angle through the Karplus relation. At particular angles, variations in the Karplus relation parameters (a, b, c) lead to differences of up to 3 Hz even though the experimental uncertainties are generally lower than 0.1 Hz …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At particular angles, variations in the Karplus relation parameters (a, b, c) lead to differences of up to 3 Hz even though the experimental uncertainties are generally lower than 0.1 Hz. [57][58][59] 3 J HNHα , 3 J HαHβ , and 3 J HNH2 coupling constants are related to the dihedral angles of � S , c S and q NÀ Acetyl (Figure 2), and were calculated from MD and LEUS simulations using the following Karplus relations. [60][61][62] Note that for Thr there is one 3 J HαHβ , while for Ser there are two possible values.…”
Section: J-coupling Constants and Noe Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests the use of S 2 order‐parameter structure refinement using time averaging in order to obtain a conformational ensemble compatible with the order‐parameter data. The technique of time‐averaging order‐parameter structure refinement has been tested on the backbone 15 N− 1 H order parameters of the B3 domain of protein G, [9] and subsequently applied to backbone 15 N− 1 H order parameters of the protein IL‐4 at pH 6 to detect inconsistencies and model flaws regarding complementary sets of NMR data, [18] and applied to backbone 15 N− 1 H order parameters of the protein hGH at pH 2.7 in order to explain the occurrence of low order‐parameter values in the middle of stable helices [19] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%